You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
9 points

I, from the UK, once had a ‘conversation’ about gun control with an American on Reddit. What brought this about was the day before a 9 year old girl was killed by a stray bullet from a drive-by. One moment she was in her bedroom doing some homework, and the next she was dead.

After a lot of back and forth with him getting more flummoxed and aggressive he then said something like “If she was outside playing like a normal kid then she wouldn’t have been killed.”
Yep, he blamed her.

That was the time I realised it was a waste of everything talking about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

people who argue that their right to guns is more important than a persons right to life is inherently moronic, and shouldn’t be listened to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

One thing I’ve learned is that, if you write a comment with reasonable
balance of views and still get attacks, the posters are people without proper trainings on critical debates.

In case of the gun ban, it’s even worse because most people never lived in the rest of the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate

Are guns legal in: El Salvador, Venezuela, Eswatini, Jamaica, Honduras, Guatemala, Brazil, and Columbia?

All of those nations have higher firearm death rates than the US.

If guns are illegal in any of the nations with higher firearm death rates than the US, then can you acknowledge that banning guns is not the only issue? Maybe culture has something to do with it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

you just named countries well known for organized crime and corrupt government officials.

I don’t think it is the same

permalink
report
parent
reply

then can you acknowledge that banning guns is not the only issue? Maybe culture has something to do with it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Did you not read the part where they said that dumb Americans can shut up and keep their idiocacy to themselves?

Like honestly, this is the DUMBEST fucking argument I’ve ever heard.

Multiple factors contribute to the both the rate and severity of violent crime, congratulations Einstein! Now answer me this, when multiple factors contribute to something happening, and you want to stop that something from happening, do you a) sit around and do nothing and say it’s impossible to address in any way shape or form cause the solution requires addressing multiple factors, or do you b) try and address all the factors contributing to it, starting with the easiest and most obvious ones?

Like Jesus Christ, think with your fucking brain, not the lead dust poisoning it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Calm down and people might take you seriously.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Guns are legal in all those countries besides Venezuela. Cos guns are legal in most of the world. It’s just they are generally controlled. And Venezuela is on the verge on collapse anyway. I don’t think this is the slam dunk argument you think it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Guns are legal in all those countries besides Venezuela. Cos guns are legal in most of the world.

Then why doesn’t most of the world have a firearm homicide rate comparable to that of the US?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“That was the time I realised it was a waste of everything talking about it.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

getting more flummoxed and aggressive

This seems to apply to ya’ll.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 511K

    Comments