Share your shave of the day!

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points

Now, I think of it as a mix of safety belt (not a nuisance) and training wheels (very much a nuisance).

Yeah, interesting analogy, and spot-on IMO. The training wheels aspect can be overdone. The Henson razor is a design that exemplifies this I think; safety to the detriment of technique development. (Again, IMO. Judging from what I see in pictures). I became aware of technique during my first bout with straight razor shaving years ago. Admittedly, I really didn’t focus on it until I took up wetshaving as a hobby. That was a big mistake.

DE razors were probably much cheaper to manufacture than Micromatics?

This is certainly true about 3-piece razors, but I think the “big win” was with the band steel used for DE blades. There’s less steel mass to each blade and almost zero cost to machining both sides of the band. I’m not sure how the user benefits from this. I guess it was a greater benefit to manufacturers than anyone else. I’ve heard many times that Gillette made razors in order to sell blades.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Again, IMO. Judging from what I see in pictures

You’re right. If you want to confirm your suspicion for yourself, I’d be happy to loan you my Henson mild.

I’ve heard many times that Gillette made razors in order to sell blades.

I think that works for every blade format of Gillette except the DE blade, which was very quickly copied and Gillette had to compete unlike the later monopolies on patented cartridges.

I think the “big win” was with the band steel used for DE blades

GEM did that too with the double edge Micromatic blades. Single, spineless piece of band steel with an edge on either side and relatively simple cutouts.

Injector blades are single edge, but very narrow and probably don’t use much more steel per edge that DE blades of the time (they weren’t thin like today).

If you take into account that people used to hone even disposable blades to save money, the GEM format has a huge advantage over DE: if you sharpen a DE blade many times, the edge disappears behind the top cap and becomes useless. A GEM blade can be filed down several millimetres before the mechanism doesn’t push it all the way to the blade stops anymore.

I think the victory or the DE blade might be due to non-technical reasons. Better marketing and early market penetration?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Anecdotally, I’ve bought an MMOC with an old blade in it that had been honed so many times that it had a very obvious frown

permalink
report
parent
reply

WetShaving

!wetshaving@sub.wetshaving.social

Create post

This is a community of enthusiasts, hobbyists and artisans who enjoy a traditional wet shave: brush, soap, and safety or straight razor. We are a part of the WetShaving community found on Reddit, Discord, and IRC.

New subscribers welcome!

Please visit our wiki, which is always and forever a work in progress.

🪒 Check out these alternative front-ends for this server:

https://gem.wetshaving.social/ - a nice modern interface

https://old.wetshaving.social/ - designed to look like old.reddit.com

Our sister Mastodon instance is https://wetshaving.social/.

🪒 Track the uptime of our various services here:

https://uptime.splettnet.com/status/wetshaving

🪒 Community Rules

Rule 1 - Behaviour and Etiquette
  • Be Respectful. Do not bully, flame, or harass others.

  • Malicious comments are not allowed but heated discussion and salty banter is okay.

  • Low effort replies and complaints about content will be removed.

Rule 2 - Content Guidelines
  • Mail Calls, Simple Questions, and SOTD posts belong in the recurring weekly threads.

  • Posts must have sufficient content to generate a meaningful discussion.

  • Images, links, or videos must include additional text that summarizes the topic.

Rule 3 - Reviews and Disclosure
  • Use [First Impressions] in the title if your experience with the product is limited.

  • Use the [Review] in the title if you can provide comprehensive details with enough familiarity to answer follow-up questions.

  • Disclose how the product being reviewed was acquired (e.g., PIF, loan, or purchase). If the product was provided to you directly by the maker or vendor free of charge or at a discount, you must disclose this fact even if the item will later be returned to the maker or vendor.

Rule 4 - Advertising
  • Vendors are to keep marketing within the biweekly Deals/New Products threads.

  • Non-vendors may post topics about products if it will foster a compelling discussion.

  • Do not solicit donations or share fundraisers without mod approval.

Rule 5 - Inappropriate Content
  • All NSFW/L content must request mod approval and be flaired appropriately.

  • Non-shaving related NSFW/L content is not allowed.

Rule 10 - Moderator Discretion
  • The rules may not apply perfectly to every situation. The mods have final discretion.

Community stats

  • 51

    Monthly active users

  • 731

    Posts

  • 7.9K

    Comments