You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
19 points

I don’t know… sounds like Republicans gathering together to overthrow the government with a fairly elected president. Seems worse to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

@FlyingSquid I’m not saying 1 isn’t worse than the other.

I’m saying you don’t allow mobarchy *of any kind* to rule.

How can that be difficult to understand?

The goal must be to have intelligent considered-reason, objectivity, & sanity/wisdom rule.

Neither side wants that.

They want their-reactions to be ruling.

One of the people from the NYT, I think it was, admitted that the NYT & CNN “shut down” the progressive issues & the progressive voices.

That isn’t journalism, that isn’t democracy, that is bullshit propaganda-enforcement *gaslighting* as being “journalism”.

I’m saying, specifically, that the *displacement* of journalism by the NYT & CNN is going to bit their faction in the ass,
when the “acceptable” to them Biden institution doesn’t have the traction to win 2024.

And they are going to not-accept any responsibility, of course, for their part in preventing reality from having any chance in that election.

US Civil War Part2 is going to happen.

Power divorced from accountability, which describes both sides, or all sides, … has consequences.

And 1 of those consequences, in the long term, is destruction of the allowed-to-completely-corrupt country.

-–

There was a guy, Glubb, iirc, who realized that empires always die around 2.5 centuries old.

the Roman Empire, the British Empire, the Catholic Empire … did it follow the pattern?

Anyways, there is a book “How To Hide An Empire” on the US Empire, and all the bullshit done to hide what it actually is…

It’s time is done.

It’s a natural process.

The original ruling-class has their identity,
the empire’s population changes, as empire-populations must do,
the ruling-class’s identity mismatches, more & more & more, the reality of the empire,
then the ruling-class has a kind of conniption trying to “reestablish” their “rightful” rule, but the entire context has changed, but their identity rejects the evidence…

… and you get narcissistic lashing-out, you get genociding, you get ultra-unstoppable corruption, you get criminality, you get authority gaslighting everywhere, you get legalism highjacking “justice”, you get … *disintegration*.

There is a limit on how long an empire can live.

The US’s limit has been hit.

While it is theoretically-possible for the US to *adapt & transform*, … the odds of that happening are … oh, zillion:1 against?

something like that.

-–

You can’t have Justice without accountability.

You can’t have Right without Integrity.

You can’t have a competent citizenry without citizens being *made* competent ( proper education ) in journalism, in critical-reasoning, etc…

None of the prerequisites are in-place.

That the right, throughout the world, wants to eradicate education, speaks immensely about its real design: it wants people only animal-reacting.

That the left, however, treats working-class people contemptuously, so that education is for the *middle* class’s becoming managers, but the *working* class are the middle-class’s inferiors…

it’s galling.

it’s insulting.

it’s class-narcissism.

That isn’t education, that is “education”, with the falsifying-quotes on it.

Everything’s been corrupted, every system, every rule, every law, everything of our civilization has been corrupted somehow, some way,
and people insist that one has to “make do with the corrupt-system, and act only within its process”…

and somehow un-corrupt things??

I’ve been gaslit enough.

Breaking the dishonesty from all dimensions of civilization, all at once, is required for humankind’s surviving of The Great Filter.

If humankind won’t?

Then Universe will carve our extinguishment as a warning to *intelligent* species who evolve in this galaxy.

Universe can’t care.

Political-motivation, *itself*, is corrupt.

Only objectivity can survive this century.

But humankind has no need to survive, at all, right?

Ignorance-indulging can be “a statement” that humankind makes, right?

-–

Anybody who says that the corruption of the left or the corruption of the right MUST be accepted, is full of it.

Corruption doesn’t need to be accepted.

Integrity is a possible alternative.

Mobarchy, whether left or right, whether mild or vicious, is still mobarchy.

Fuck mobarchy.

Rule of Considered-Reason, Objectivity, Right-Values, Wisdom, Sane-Strategy, Living World, etc.

That is proper.

_ /\ _

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Mate don’t take this the wrong way but your posts are starting to sound like the time cube guy

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

@camr_on I have no idea what you’re referring to.

Mute me: it costs you nothing to disappear me from your view.

_ /\ _

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yeah, I’m not reading your manifesto.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I made it like half way through before realizing I’m reading the ramblings of a schizo. Dude needs medication.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 481K

    Comments