I watch porn from time to time, and Iโm tired of the faux incest trend because:
-
I donโt believe having sex with a step sibling is incest (note the difference between a step sibling and a half sibling);
-
This kind of thing caters toward a crowd who actually does want to fuck their mom or their sister, because thatโs what they actually call each other, despite the title; and
-
Itโs every video everywhere. Itโs done to death. Can I please watch an average size dude kiss on, slowly undress, and adequately eat out his slightly chubby girl before giving her a perfectly cromulent weinering? It doesnโt have to be exaggerated to be hot.
I think the incest phenomenon in porn was forced.
I personally donโt read the titles and just base my clicks off of the appearance of the woman in the thumbnail, and usually I have it on mute because I donโt want to hear some dude huffing and puffing.
I know itโs not real incest so the title honestly doesnโt matter, but every time I click an incest vid, I get added to the โoh, this IP is into incest!โ list. This started slowly and a long time ago, but I think most views of incest vids are just people who see a hot woman in the thumbnail and click it without really caring about the stupid title.
Itโs over-done, but I sometimes like step-porn, and Iโve never felt like I wanted to do actual incest; step family or otherwise, lol. I like my porn to have some kind of minimal story/lead-up, and I guess step-porn is an easy way to do that. I donโt think I would like the very vanilla porn you described though :) Threesome, orgy, and ganbang porn is what I usually watch (if it has some kind of lead-up). I kinda miss when they used to make actual porn โmoviesโ with some kind of plot.
I think the porn thatโs more geared toward women is better for this type of, I guess, more holistic porn. Not to say that women canโt be into filthy and vapid sex (no hate), but generally speaking that stuff is very easy to find in the vast majority of male gaze-y content.
In regards to #1 - I have never understood the whole blood related = gross. Like I get it, risk of genetic disease is much higher.But I have always though that the grosness comes from the nature of the pre-existing relationship dynamic.
Lets say two peoe who met in their 20s and are married do an ill guided mail-in ancestry test and find out they are 1st cousins or even siblings. Apart from the obvious issue of managing offspring risk, I donโt see why this would automatically kill the relationship or be gross.
E: Interesting, seems ive hit an unpopular opinion. Anyone care to elaborate?
