You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-30 points
*

All EVs still require coal or oil for the electricity. And that doesn’t even factor in mining for the metals to make these things.

EV are okay but they’re not a solution to our resource consumption problem.

Edit: imagine being mad at the truth lol?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

For China specifically and at the present time this is true, but China is investing heavily into solar and other renewables that will shift its energy mix dramatically in the coming years. Not to mention that even now, it’s still a net benefit to centralize that fossil fuel consumption into plants that can burn it more efficiently and with better pollution controls than are feasible on cars.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Except that many places are majority renewables for electricity

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

That use plastics and rare metals and glass all of which aren’t infinite resources.

Two decades from now we will still be struggling with a climate crisis and these “solutions” aren’t solutions

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Glass? That is in no way a rare resource. We have alternatives to plastic and alternative battery architectures are being developed from multiple quarters. It’s true that these still have environmental impact but it’s still a huge improvement over ICE vehicles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

You seem to be forgetting that wind, solar, geothermal, hydroelectric, and nuclear power exist.

Not to mention that, even with coal generating the energy for the cars, EVs still have lower lifetime emissions than any ICE car.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

But there is still the precious metal mining which often is diesel engines.

The point is regardless of what we use it is a bandaid to the issue. That issue being over mining our very limited resources

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

the diesil trucks will also be replaced with sustainably powered ev machines too. think more than 12 months ahead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

I agree with you, but I urge you to spell it out a bit more. We still need to transport lots of goods across large distances, from distinct areas where an industry perhaps cannot be moved closer, eliminating the long distance transport.

More importantly, we do have options for recycling lithium from expended cells, not a zero-carbon process, but definitely better than continued mining.

Look, real talk: I think there very genuinely may be too many humans for this planet to naturally sustain. Even within society there are hints, in spite of the powers that be’s attempts at obfuscation. Look how many bullshit jobs there are. Late stage capitalism is a lot more than a bogeyman from what I can see.

What are your thoughts?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Diesel engines have nothing to do with what we were talking about.

And even if you want to call it a “band-aid”, that’s still better than letting the wound continue to bleed. It slows us down and gives us a chance to course correct, rather than barrelling ahead over the cliff at full speed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You’re right. Let’s do nothing instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What? I charge my EV using the solar panels on my roof. I sell what extra I don’t use myself to the electrical company. I mean sure, I bet the delivery truck ran on diesel and so on, but that’s not what you said.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 9.9K

    Posts

  • 113K

    Comments