You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point

Hope they simply bought trolley buses and didn’t waste money on battery buses

It’s such a waste to put batteries in inner city buses

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah, and the cables would install themselves automatically.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

That’s better than the buses breaking down.

https://youtu.be/B78-FgNqdc8?si=1dMORMc1EYhA6abL

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sorry but youtube experts and their google research are not a reliable source of information for me. It’s entertaining but it’s the last thing I would base city planning on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Actually electric buses make a lot more sense, as the utilisation and environmental impact would be much greater compared to normal EV cars.

Plus you are conveniently omitted mentioning the energy losses of the cables, the maintenance cost, the installation cost, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

id be genuinely surprised if the energy losses of the cables are more than the energy losses of charging the batteries even if they are they are more than likely offset by the weight difference of batteries vs the weight of the cable connecting mechanism.

Then there is the issue of range and the uptime of the vehicles while you can use a trolley 24/7 you have to charge the bev buses

Then there is the issue of extreme weather cold or hot where due to AC and or heating and the temperature itself affects the range a lot

Then there are the maintenance costs of the battery the power capacity since you need space for the batteries

So all in all you exchange a bunch of negatives for the benefit of not needing overhead cables

A trolley with a small built in battery for those last few miles you might need to connect but don’t want to pull cables is the best of both worlds.

Hope that was a comprehensive enough dismantling.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Source for your claims?

Plus do you know how expensive it is to support the whole cable infrastructure, including personnel salaries, etc. I am not convinced your math is right, but feel free to prove me wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not to mention how unbelievably ugly stringing that shit all over the service area is. Electric buses make a ton of sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Trolley buses are a weird niche. They require permanent overhead cable infrastructure like trams do but don’t have the other benefits of trams - higher capacity, greater speed, better ride and no tyre pollution. I figure if you’re going to install a trolley bus route you probably might as well install rails at the same time and get the benefits of trams. (Aka streetcars for the North Americans out there)

The City of London did assessments on trolley buses and found that the added capacity of trams made them the better choice pretty much anywhere trolley buses were proposed, despite the slightly higher install cost.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 506K

    Comments