Maine’s top election official could face an impeachment attempt in the state Legislature over her decision to keep former President Donald Trump off the Republican primary ballot.

At least one Republican lawmaker has vowed to pursue impeachment against Democratic Secretary of State Shenna Bellows despite long odds in the Democratic-controlled Legislature.

Bellows said Friday that she had no comment on the impeachment effort, but said she was duty-bound by state law to make a determination on three challenges brought by registered Maine voters. She reiterated that she suspended her decision pending an anticipated appeal by Trump in Superior Court.

“Under Maine law, I have not only the authority but the obligation to act,” she said. “I will follow the Constitution and the rule of law as directed by the courts,” she added.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
103 points
*

I feel like we are living in a simulation. We have to be bcz nobody is this insane to think that Trump didn’t break the law, and clearly based on the constitution is ineligible to be president again… the republican party has gone bat shit crazy in the last 10 years, and it’s bonkers that they have any support at all, and somehow 30-35% of the country supports this bullshit??

permalink
report
reply
-34 points
*

nobody is this insane to think that Trump didn’t break the law, and clearly based on the constitution is ineligible to be president again

Insane? There are law professors writing editorials in the New York Times about how, in their expert opinion, Trump actually is eligible. You might think they’re wrong (clearly the Maine secretary of state does) but this is a genuinely ambiguous and unsettled matter of law; there’s no “insane” side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

That’s interesting because the Times also just put out an article referencing Federalist professors who determined he should be disqualified. Looks like they’re playing both sides, lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not surprising. They are still in the horse race mode.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

It’s not a hard concept that when someone attempts coup, they should not be allowed back in power. Many many countries have put leaders in prison for less. Law has to mean something, or your country and institutions will not last. He has broken so many laws while in office it’s not even funny, and we’ve mostly turned a blind eye to it until very very recently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

they should not be allowed back in power

The law isn’t about should in that sense of the word. If Satan, the Devil, was running for President, whether or not he was legally eligible to do so would be an entirely separate question from whether or not people should vote for him. The article I linked to argues that

According to longstanding congressional precedent and legal authority, the phrase “civil office under the United States” did not include the office of president of the United States.

That might plausibly be true no matter how bad Trump is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

What they claim is to disagree whether it constituted a coup attempt. Some say “it was unsuccessful” which is of course rather a dimwitted claim. Some still insist it was merely a protest and not a coup attempt. Nobody seems to dispute that Trump was involved and encouraged it. Anyhow, like most things republicans argue, they have a preconceived result and make up nonsense to support it, and it’s very biased - imagine if it had been democrats and Obama involved in something like that? They’d still be completely losing their shit about it and they couldn’t find enough harsh things to say about the participants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Kind of surreal to see someone arguing that an insurrection isn’t a disqualifying action for a presidential candidate and that it’s clearly just a matter of opinion with a legit argument

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Their literal response to one of the most serious crimes in existence was “no you” and there is a realistic chance they could be the next most powerful government in the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Republicans are insane right now. They’re going full fascist. I don’t know what else you call it when they so blatantly ignore the rule of law to disrupt the peaceful transition of power to stay in power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

The attempted coup was standard run-of-the-mill authoritarianism. There are dozens of other examples for why they are irrefutably fascist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah, but the reaction to being called fascist is that conservatives on lemmy, reddit, etc will always claim their accuser has no idea what fascism is… So ridiculous

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Lol true, I should’ve said authoritarian or tyrannical.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Yeah, the last time this scenario played out, people put up with a lot of bullshit and terror before people got organized to try to stop it … that led to a world war where millions died.

The best time to stop this madness is now because if you don’t, it takes far more force and even violence as time moves on.

I’m not exaggerating … I’m being serious because I don’t want to live in a timeline that our ancestors fought and died to avoid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The left has a serious problem with direct action.

Meanwhile the core tenet of fascism is “By any means necessary”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Direct action required dehumanizing your opponent, which is largely something those on the left are against but those on the right do constantly. It’s at best a small surprise that there isn’t more stochastic violence from the left.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The absolute stupid part of all this is … this is happening while we are destroying our environment which will lead to our demise or eventual destruction.

The train we’re on is on fire and on its way to the end the track that’s going to fly us off a cliff … and we’re arguing about who’s going to drive the train and where we’re going to sit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

They know he broke the law- they just don’t think he should be held accountable for it.

“I would pardon Trump if he is found guilty (…) What’s in the best interest of the country is not to have an 80-year-old man sitting in jail that continues to divide our country.” -Nikki “why wouldn’t the party of racist sexist bigots elect a nonwhite woman for President?” Haley.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 465K

    Comments