In launch event on Friday, agency shared plans to test over US cities to see if it’s quiet enough by engaging ‘the people below’

Nasa has unveiled a one-of-a-kind quiet supersonic aircraft as part of the US space agency’s mission to make commercial supersonic flight possible.

In a joint ceremony with Lockheed Martin Skunk Works in Palmdale, California, on Friday, Nasa revealed the X-59, an experimental aircraft that is expected to fly at 1.4 times the speed of sound – or 925mph (1,488 km/h).

The aircraft, which stands at 99.7ft (30.4 metres) long and 29.5ft wide, has a thin, tapered nose that comprises nearly a third of the aircraft’s full length – a feature designed to disperse shock waves that would typically surround supersonic aircraft and result in sonic booms.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
14 points

Pierce said the X-59’s job would be to “collect data from the people below, determine if that sonic thump is acceptable and then turn the data over to US and international regulatory authorities in hopes to then lift that ban”.

Why can’t commercial airlines fund the project, then? Why is NASA investing public money to deregulate private industry?

permalink
report
reply
42 points

Huh? NASA is providing thought leadership to expand the possibilities of human travel, but has no interest in running a commercial airline.

Many technologies you use every day started as NASA research

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Why are tax dollars going to something that will only benefit a small percentage of people and will cause relatively bad environmental damage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Are you aware what NASA stands for?

I personally am happy some of my tax dollars go towards advancing science.

The reason we have issues in society…homeless people, lack of universal healthcare, etc is not because we find NASA, it’s via mismanagement of the funds we have, and bad politics, etc. None of which are NASAs fault or purpose.

NASA does a huge amount of environmental research as well. But part of their team focuses on experimental flight, and this is a product of that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Nasa is always researching supersonic/hypersonic travel, that’s what a space agency does.

It would be hard to list ALL of the ways that research benefits you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

The first A in NASA is aeronautics. They just do the science. I would say deregulation is a fairly strong word here. It’s more like they’d be updating the laws to reflect modern tech.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

This is literally how every expensive R&D project gets done. Private companies won’t dump this kind of money into good R&D, but the government will because they don’t care about ROI.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Except this ignores the existence of bell labs, you know the private R&D lab with ten Nobel prizes and a laundry list of inventions that quite literally shaped our modern world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Deregulate is not the same as engineering a solution to solve the problem that was previously solved by regulations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The assumption that all regulations are good now, and in perpetuity, is the issue here. Deregulation of shite or outdated regs is a good thing ffs.

It’s insane to me that the word seems so opaque to people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This is probably defense spending, tbh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

American is a Socialist country for those wealthy enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

This is outsourced to Lockheed Martin so it’s basically just using Nasa to fund the military even more. There is nothing commercially interesting about this. It’s all military planes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, this might be missile research.

permalink
report
parent
reply

science

!science@lemmy.world

Create post

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren’t liked generally. I’ve posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don’t screen everything, lrn2scroll

Community stats

  • 3.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments