Women in India’s northeastern state of Manipur have attacked the house of the main suspect in a sexual assault case that has enraged the nation, police said.

The person allegedly dragged two tribal women onto the streets in May and later incited

content warning sexual assault

a mob to rape and parade them naked

police said on Friday, as ethnic clashes between the mostly Hindu Meitei and mainly Christian Kuki-Zo communities engulfed the remote state.

The sexual assault took place over two months ago but it captured national attention after a short video went viral on social media earlier this week.

The main suspect, identified as Khuirem Herodas, a Meitei, was arrested on Thursday hours after Prime Minister Narendra Modi, breaking his nearly 80-day silence on Manipur violence, condemned the alleged sexual assault as “shameful” and promised tough action.

Three others also were arrested and a police official said were tracing at least 30 others involved in the crime.

“Local women pelted stones and burnt some parts of the house belonging to the prime accused in a village,” said Hemant Pandey, a senior police official in the state capital Imphal.

“We request women to protest peacefully as there is intense unease. We understand their rage,” he said.

Protests were planned in several parts of India by rights groups demanding justice and swift investigations into the latest incident to raise questions about the safety of women in the country.

The sexual assault was reported by the victims in May after ethnic clashes began in Manipur.

The fighting was triggered by a court order that the government should consider extending special benefits enjoyed by the tribal Kuki-Zo people to the majority Meitei population as well.

At least 130 people have been killed and more than 50,000 have fled their homes since the violence erupted. Homes and churches in dozens of villages have been torched.

The Kuki-Zo community is protesting Meitei demands for reserved public job quotas and college admissions as a form of affirmative action, stoking long-held fears that they might also be allowed to acquire land in areas currently reserved for tribal groups.

“We want to know why police failed to take swift action when they knew that women were raped and paraded naked in Manipur,” said Radhika Burman, a student in the eastern city of Kolkata who is set to lead a public demonstration on Thursday.

Modi, who had not made any public remarks about the trouble in a state ruled by his Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), spoke a day after the videos showing women being assaulted went viral.

Also on Thursday, India’s Supreme Court warned Modi’s government that if it does not act, “we will”.

Opposition MPs who have submitted notices in both houses of the parliament to discuss the violence in Manipur stalled the proceedings on Friday.

“Manipur needs complete attention and we demand the prime minister make an elaborate statement in the parliament,” said Mallikarjun Kharge, the president of the opposition Congress party.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
16 points

Which isn’t really a good thing because it sets a dangerous precedent to just resort to mob justice/violence whenever there’s doubt cast on anyone. Too many innocent lives have been lost in the history of the world because they were victims of mob mentality.

I’m saying this as an Indian person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

As an Indian person, you definitely also know that Indian officials are highly corrupted! It’s something world-famous (or infamous?)

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Agreed, the corruption is laughable. But the best way to go about it is with peaceful protests. Burning down a suspected person’s house…I can’t agree with that line of thinking. Taking justice into your own hands isn’t a good way for a civilized society to behave. It’s really tough, but mob justice has killed innocent people all throughout history. I will never support it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Ask the rape victims if they live in a civilised society. If a corrupt society refuses to give people justice then they have no option but to take matters into their own hands.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m not necessarily condoning this act, but throughout the history of human society, peaceful protest has rarely brought about meaningful change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Would aiming this rage at a corrupted official who did nothing change that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Peaceful protests achieve fucking nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

Modi is a piece of shit who uses stochastic terrorism to promote mob justice and violence against the minority Muslim, Christian, Sikh, and Buddhist communities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Agreed entirely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s better than nothing :/ Until a better form of resolution exists, the unrest is heavily justified.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I think the best course of action is peaceful protests and making the issue known worldwide, even more so than already.

Burning down the house of a suspect isn’t the right thing to do. If by chance they kill an innocent person, are these people really going to go to take responsibility for it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Yes and this is the exact reason why vigilance is absolutely shameful.

If you don’t respect the rights of whomever you accuse and give them a fair opportunity to defend himself, you are not better than them, as you too would be a criminal. History shows that.

When the courts are corrupt you need new courts, but you still need them, you can’t just skip the law. That’s how countries fall apart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Action is always better than inaction. Them doing this is miles better than letting the status quo continue due to a lazy or corrupt police/state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I heavily disagree that action is always better than inaction. This is how wars are started. The system sucks but peaceful protests are the way to do enact change as a civilized society. If by some chance these people kill an innocent person, they’re not going to take responsibility for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Uhm. Peaceful protests are also a form of action. Inaction is in the name, it’s not doing anything.

I’m not saying this is the best way about it, but it’s a good way to force change compared to sitting back and waiting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Peaceful protests have rarely ever worked historically innmy opinion.

Peaceful protest juxtaposed with violent protests and mass civil disobedience has historically been effective.

I.E mlk vs malcom x

Or in this situation ghandi vs most of the other leaders.

Who burnt parts of the country down every time ghandi was arrested / ignored

“We must peacefully protest” results in nothing

We must peacefully protest - aka - we must not anger our overlords to much lest they be truly angry with us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

When the government refuse to take action, the people will. You want to stop mob violence, you get police to handle matters better.

The women in your country are standing up for themselves because the men apparently won’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

is your name a reference to warframe

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yes it is!

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 272K

    Comments