There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
1 point

This is dumb. Yes you should have right on red.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

It’s more dangerous to pedestrians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Both parties needs to just look Before moving.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The walk signal puts it on drivers IMO, as a driver that is sick of driving. It’s the same idea as how it is not recommended to wave people on and just follow the road rules as closely as possible so you don’t wave them into danger by giving them an erroneous sense of safety, only the walk signal is doing it. I walk, bike, and drive so I am pretty aware of what could unexpectedly be dangerous, and it’s everything and a lot of it. The entirety of north America needs infrastructure overhaul and reform. This just isn’t working.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Isn’t that part of the job of the lights in the first place, to give everyone their own “timeslot” they can cross safely with?

I’m from the UK, we don’t have anything like this, I’m not 100% sure I know exactly how it works, but it seems pretty dangerous to me.

I can imagine a busy 6 lane intersection with filled lanes and crossing Peds going in all directions, you’re just asking for an accident

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

While drivers should look, folks are dumb. I love my right on red, but hate folks getting hurt for that. Ugh… why drivers gotta suck.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Hacker News

!hackernews@derp.foo

Create post

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules
  1. Keep it legal
  2. Keep it civil and SFW
  3. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

Community stats

  • 2

    Monthly active users

  • 9.2K

    Posts

  • 6.2K

    Comments

Community moderators