You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
202 points

She was involved in a major historical event where the person she thought she’d be with forever died right in front of her.

Also she’s telling the story of the Titanic to people who asked her to tell the story about her time on the Titanic. Why would her kids or family be relevant? This is just rage bait.

permalink
report
reply

She also wasn’t on her deathbed lol she was just old

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

She died in bed at the end of the movie, so technically she was on her death bed every night that she slept on that ship.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t remember that, is that a deleted scene?

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points
*

Even besides all that, why does any of this reflect on other women? incel ass shit

Edit: judging by the voting, a bunch of incels found this thread

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

I think the post is dumb but the logic is that it reflects on other women because millions of them think it’s a good love story (as per the post).

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Except, this logic falls apart immediately when you start understanding that she was in love with the dude and he died trying to save her. That’s something you remember your whole life. This is just a bad unhealthy take from OP and the downvoters here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Sure, but millions of women are able to separate fiction from reality, and thus are able to appreciate a story which didn’t really happen, unlike this anon

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Rose had adopted a new life under an assumed name after the sinking. Her family wasn’t even aware that she had been on the Titanic, much less met what she considered her soulmate.

Rose allowed herself to tell the story that had weighed on her for 70 years, nearly her entire life, because she knew she was nearing the end of her life.

That’s why her scenes are so powerful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

OT:
I can’t find the critique of this movie from a classicist viewpoint anymore. That was one interesting read.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m so confused because I thought Rose was an amalgamation but you’re speaking of a singular individual in a factual way that makes me wonder how wrong I am. Is there really a Rose from the titanic that aligns with what you’re saying?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Not sure how long it’s been since you saw the movie but it starts and ends with a much older Rose in the modern era, on board a research vessel out looking for the wreck of the Titanic. While aboard she starts telling the story of her time on the Titanic, that story then becomes the rest of the film. There’s a sort of epilogue at the end where she wraps it up, then passes away in bed.

I think that’s what OP is talking about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Why would anyone get angry about this lol

permalink
report
parent
reply

> Greentext

!greentext@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 1.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 446

    Posts

  • 9.5K

    Comments

Community moderators