You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
8 points

It’s more likely that they see rust as a good successor to their legacy c++ code. Microsoft has always been heavily invested in C++ after all.

They don’t want to sell rust. It’s not a money maker for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The article is clear that this is about C# not C++. Is the romance for managed languages wearing off - I wonder what issues they are seeing.

Microsoft is big in C++, but they are also pushing C++ to be a lot safer. Modern C++ isn’t as safe as rust, but it is still much safer than C or C++98.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Tail latency and memory usage?

It’s hard for me to come up with any other big advantages that Rust has and C# couldn’t easily lift.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hopefully they won’t come up with some kind of a Rust/CLI, a version of Rust with GC support.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Rust

!rust@programming.dev

Create post

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits
  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

Community stats

  • 392

    Monthly active users

  • 836

    Posts

  • 3.8K

    Comments