Few milestones in life mean as much to the American Dream as owning a home. And millennials have encountered the kind of trouble totally befitting their generation, which largely graduated into the teeth of the disastrous post-2008 job market. Just as they entered peak homebuying and household formation age, housing affordability is at 40-year lows, and mortgage rates are near 40-year highs.

The anxiety this generation feels about the prospect of never owning their own home affects their entire perception of their finances and the economy, says Moody’s chief economist Mark Zandi.

“If they feel like they’re locked out of owning a home it colors their perceptions about everything else going on in their financial lives,” Zandi says.

Millennials have long been dogged by a brutal housing market. They faced not one, but two, cataclysmic economic events—the Great Financial Crisis in 2008 and the pandemic in 2020. Both of which left them reeling financially and struggling to afford a home. The Great Recession decimated the real estate market as the economy nearly collapsed under the weight of tenuous mortgage backed securities. While the pandemic brought with it a remote work boom that caused millions of citydwellers to flee to the suburbs, sending housing prices soaring.

Archive link

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-56 points

me to care for my father

That’s your choice to make then.

Moving is an option, you are prioritizing your father’s comfort over your own life.

You can do that, but no one us forcing you to.

You can tell your dad “look I’m leaving, I can’t afford it here. You can come with me or not, but I have my own life to live and this place is killing me”

If he doesn’t come with you, then that’s on him.

He is a grown ass man, you aren’t his parent…

Often I see this case, if you purposefully choose to shackle yourself to a relative, that’s no longer "the economy"s fault you can’t afford life. You made a choice to live outside your means, and that choice has consequences.

You always have the option to leave and most if the time if push came to shove, your relative will cave and follow.

Of not, you aren’t responsible for them, stop lighting yourself on fire to keep someone else warm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Man you just keep finding new and inventive ways to continuously prove how much of a dick you are in this thread.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-27 points
*

It’s a fundamental truth. Children feeling compelled to care for their parents is purely their choice.

I never said it was a bad choice, but it is a choice.

But if you do make that choice, it has consequences.

The concept of children “owing” their parents their lives is anachronistic and ignores the fact the parent chose to have them.

Any parent that feels their children owe taking care of the parent in their older age is an asshole, period. A parent that raised their child well should produce a child that wants to help their parent out of love, not a feeling of owed necessary.

The former is family and love, the latter is narcissistic parents that think they “own” their child.

BUT a child shouldn’t be killing themselves to take care of their parent. Any parent that actually loves their child would never ask their child to give up their own life to suit the parents comfort.

A good parent will do whatever it takes to support their child, and if that means leaving their old life behind to move (with their child) somewhere more affordable so the child can actually afford to take care of them, that shouldn’t even be a tough question for the parent to answer, it should be an instant “yes, if you are sure you want to do that I’ll support your decision”

Parents that compel their children to live outside their means just because they won’t move with them somewhere in their means because they dont want to leave their old home behind are shitty parents, period

Parents should never be prioritizing their own comfort at the cost of their children’s success in life. If you do that, you were never fit to have a child.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

The concept of children “owing” their parents their lives is anachronistic and ignores the fact the parent chose to have them.

We get it. Your parents were shit to you, so the concept of loving and being loved is foreign and unheard to you. People choose to care for their parents because they love them, ya dink.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*

He is a grown ass man, you aren’t his parent…

Man, I sure hope your kids tell you this when you’re unable to care for yourself. Or better yet I hope you don’t have kids, no need to continue your parasitic family tree. Self righteous prick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Dude you really need to get off the internet now and then. You are so entirely out of touch with normal humans…

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

That’s a lot of psychopathic assumptions I’m just going to pretend you didn’t say. The point is the reality for most is dire and your clearly more interested in winning the conversation than understanding those shitheads on social media are only getting views because they are validating real problems in the economy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

I’m just going to pretend you didn’t say

That’s easier than confronting reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Confronting reality is when you realize you’ll be old and alone, with no one around to give a shit about you. Don’t worry, you’ll see it someday, champ. I’m hoping for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Of not, you aren’t responsible for them, stop lighting yourself on fire to keep someone else warm.

Imagine if all of society operated on this person’s principals of “fuck you, I got mine!”.

It’s basically the GOP playbook.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

There’s a huge difference between helping others within your means vs outside your means.

This is actually the first principle of the Hippocratic Oath that doctors take, if you’ve read it.

Prioritizing your own health comes first, because a dead doctor can’t save anyone else anymore.

Sacrificing your own health to try and help others typically is net negative cause now someone else has to look after your sorry ass in the fallout.

Working yourself to the bone helps no one, it’s just net negative and doesn’t do any favors.

That’s explicitly why I said “lighting yourself on fire”, which is actively harmful and tends to be, you know, lethal.

But it’s so much easier to strawman what I said into something else entirely and attack that instead yeah?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

lol.

Troll.

Go troll elsewhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Holy shit dude. You are an actual psychopath aren’t you? Fucking Ebenezer Scrooge pre ghostly trio levels of heartless.

Fucking hell…

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Probably saw shows like House and Sherlock and thought “if I act like this it’ll mean I’m special too!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

See my write up in detail here, hopefully it helps shed more light on my point:

https://lemmy.world/comment/7448016

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Heeeeellllll no. Seen enough that I am not touching that with a ten foot pole. I value my mental health more than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 467K

    Comments