You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
286 points

This is such a non-thing that it hurts to even consider how stupid it is.

But, let’s consider:

  1. The Super Bowl is a private corporate event; any song may be performed ceremoniously. That’s protected speech.

  2. Not standing up for the Black National Anthem is whatever. That’s protected speech.

  3. The Black National Anthem is a colloquial title and has no legal status. That’s protected speech.

  4. While there is a statute outlying etiquette for performances of the National Anthem, there are no penalties for not adhering. That’s protected speech.

  5. “America the Beautiful” was also performed and there’s no legal basis for etiquette or participation. This song also has a long history of being performed alongside the Star-Spangled Banner to the point that it’s sometimes referred to as the National Hymn, even though that is a colloquial and non-legal designation. That’s protected speech.

  6. This is apparently the fourth year that “Lift Every Voice and Sing” has been performed at the Super Bowl. That’s protected speech.

permalink
report
reply

Republicans are anti free speech and always have been. ✅

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Make this movie

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Remember they believe in Don’t thread on me. Weird

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Nah, they believe in “No Step on Snek”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Especially when it goes against their religion. And they follow the American civic religion

permalink
report
parent
reply
-32 points

Oh, who are you kidding? Everyone is against mah freeze peach as long as they get to choose what gets said.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Not how that works buddy

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

They didn’t, at least not in what I read.

They’re just outlining how stupid the argument is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-28 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

The larger context of why anyone is talking about what is sung at the Super Bowl should have been enough of a set up, but apparently not.

This entire stunt is predicated on the right’s frustration that they couldn’t do anything about black athletes and allies being disrespectful during the National Anthem (a legally defined song with etiquette spelled out in the US legal code), which is protected speech.

Now, in my opinion, they have a Super Bowl to posture about eight months before a presidential election. They want sound bites and over-the-top reactions so that they can paint themselves the victims of a hypocritical, leftist, anti-freedom conspiratorial media machine. This part of that “projection” plank in the modern GOP.

My original post was simply outlining that no matter how you slice it, there is nothing to be mad about them “protesting” the Black National Anthem. I added in a rhetorical refrain to drive home the point while beating a dead horse for effect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thank you

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t think the nfl is what protected speech is about. They’re welcome to be morons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I never understand this argument from Americans.

Why can’t people be pissed off with what a private company does? Like if there is a sweet company that makes blueberry flavour and it’s the best. If they stop selling it then I can be pissed. The argument “well it’s a private company it can do what it wants” is in no way related to if I get to be pissed at it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

They have freedom to do as they please, but whining about it does about as much as whining about blueberry flavor.

We aren’t saying you can’t be pissed, we are saying it is completely stupid that you are pissed and there is nothing you can do. There are far more things to be worried about in this country. We are eating ourselves alive, life expectancy is dropping, suicide rate and overdose rate is climbing, our jobs are being given to foreign countries and robots, no one owns anything anymore.

I’m starting to believe people whine about these pointless things in order to avoid confronting the more complicated and deeply rooted issues we have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Culture and community is absolutely important to a lot of people. In fact it could be very important for happiness.

Maybe people don’t care about monetary things as much as you. Or maybe they care about both. It’s possible to care about everything you said and the superbowl.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well, you can choose the things you care about. Why waste your energy getting upset about something that has zero negative consequences in your life when you could be doing something productive, <s> like arguing on Lemmy? </s>

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Exactly we all wasting our time here.

I have no problem, as a concept, with people complaining about things there care about.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 22K

    Posts

  • 549K

    Comments