William Weber, a LowEndTalk member, was raided by Austrian police in 2012 for operating a Tor exit node that was allegedly used to distribute child pornography. While he was not arrested, many of his computers and devices were confiscated. He was later found guilty of supporting the distribution of child pornography through his Tor exit node, though he claims it was unintentional and he was simply supporting free speech and anonymity. He was given a 5 year probation sentence but left Austria shortly after. Though some articles portray him negatively, it is debatable whether he intentionally supported child pornography distribution or simply operated in the legal grey area of Tor exit nodes.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
24 points

Yes we should. How would you go about doing that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Put it in the dark web’s terms of service.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Imagine trying to enforce such a thing on the dark web. What would you call the people who would end up with that job?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Put a CP detector at dark web(no CP) exit nodes and throttle the speed to shit when triggered?

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Oh yeah, packet sniffing exit nodes in a privacy oriented network will surely go down well and will have no unforeseen consequences

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean it’s an exit node and the open web you don’t really get to complain about lack of privacy when leaving Tor.

OTOH, there’s a simple problem: That traffic is still likely encrypted. It’s not like Tor exit nodes do the TLS handshake, do they? That would indeed be much stranger than applying traffic shaping.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

It’s been working fine for 20+ years already, with consequences foreseen from the beginning:

  • Don’t trust exit nodes, they get the final packets and can do with them whatever they want.
  • If you put identifying data in an unencrypted packet, the exit node will know who you are.
  • If you send identifying data (encrypted or not) to a website, the website will know who you are.
  • Trust destination websites only barely more than you’d trust them normally, and only as long as you keep the NoScript enabled.
  • If your entry node colludes with your exit node, they might analyze data traffic patterns to try and identify you.

If you want to hide your porn habits from your techie flatmate with a logging router, Tor works great. If you’re a CIA agent in Iran wanting to send some report back home without getting found out, Tor works great. If you’re a whistleblower wanting to send an anonymous tip to the Washington Post, Tor also works great. If you’re curious to see that foreign mercenary group’s website that’s blocked in your country… SWIM had to try some different circuits, but Tor also worked there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

What do you mean? The exit nodes runners are doing the heavy lifting here. It’s fair for them to do everything technically possible to avoid unwanted raids.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Start two dark webs, fill one with CP… and all the CP users will go to that one? Or something /s

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 54K

    Comments