You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
31 points

You might even need adaptive mirrors to deal with atmospheric distortion. Also, they would have to move relatively quickly and very precisely (read: an impossible combination) to track satellites in low orbit. Plus, you could only hit satellites that crossed overhead at a relatively high angle.

But yeah, one solar tower plant did a stunt where they reflected an image made of sunlight at the ISS and an astronaut took a picture. They didn’t melt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’m no optical physicist, but based on empirical evidence of not melting due to light arriving from a huge ball of thermonuclear fire 8 light minutes away (and sure it’s not exactly focused), I propose a hypotesis that light-based energy transfer in atmosphere is very lossy and not feasible as a weapon.

Which is perfect for this community, of course.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Atmospheric attenuation of light is a real thing and the intensity of solar radiation is less on the surface.

https://pace.oceansciences.org/images/Solar_spectrum_en_v5.jpg

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Why do people claim the inverse square law applies? The light has already travelled 147 million km, another 500km from the earth back to the satellite is mathematically insignificant, it’s a rounding error.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

So, the light from the sun is very spread out. This is why it doesn’t hurt you. When you take almost all of the light from a large area and focus it to a point, it starts to add up fast.

You can test this with a leaf and a magnifying glass. The mirrors in this scenario are acting as a giant lens.

The biggest question is whether the mirror array is large enough to redirect enough energy to make it though the atmosphere.

It would likely be probable if the facility was specifically designed to do this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

where they reflected an image made of sunlight at the ISS and an astronaut took a picture

got a link to said picture? it may make for a good meme template. I saw that the chinese did that kind of ‘pixel art’ with there own near identical solar thermal plant

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

They’re misremembering Italian astronaut Samantha Cristoforetti photographing the light dot where the mirrors shine at in the power plant. They were NOT shining it at the ISS.

https://www.jpost.com/omg/article-715675

https://twitter.com/AstroSamantha/status/1562833775293186049

permalink
report
parent
reply

NonCredibleDefense

!noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

Create post

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be nice

Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a “credible” source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it’s non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don’t care if you’re Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don’t want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how “open source” and “easy to find” it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody’s art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art’s source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a “haha people that I hate died… haha” punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don’t be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

Community stats

  • 4.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.8K

    Posts

  • 24K

    Comments