You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
19 points

This would straight up not work for the vast majority of the US. Public transit in most areas of the country is an absolute joke. That sort of policy would basically be tantamount to revoking poor people’s ability to travel any meaningful distance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Then it needs to come with the right to public transport. And as access to transit becomes available access to cars requires a business need.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

Ok, so first of all, the fact that I am getting downvoted shows the extend of car-related propaganda, even in “leftists” and “ecologically conscious” space. It’s sad, really, I thought I would belong here. Apparently not :(

Seconds, as I said above, they won’t put trainlines on a route where everybody’s taking their cars already.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think you are getting downvoted by a mix of people who think about it being a bit ableist policy (even tho you did include that for people who need it they should be able to take it) but also just because it’s full of US people. They are just 4% of the world population yet they act like we should talk about solutions taking them into account everytime. It’s one of the reasons that made me give ownership of slrpnk to another person, I feel like it’s a bit pointless to talk about organizing while the userbase is so spread and often so US focussed, they are basically behind in every policy.

Just move on, don’t worry my friend

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

I think you’re right. I’d want pay-per-use, networked vehicles I don’t own but can opt in to use. Also want “Call car” button in every home so if you need to go to work, get groceries etc, you push it an within 10 mins a vehicle rolls up for use.

I don’t think it’ll fly until we have reliable, safe self driving (so lol, not a Tesla) and we change our attitude towards what a vehicle is for, and why to own one.

Owing a vehicle today has been twisted into a statement of one’s “rugged individualism” (coughs mass produced car coughs) and threats to this are an attack on “muh FREEDERMS”. Just watch literally any dodge ram commercial, or anything for an SUV where a starry eyed child is being driven through a forest by parents in an SUV. It’s an image, manufactured want. Not need.

(Edit: spelling)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

I don’t care that much about americans. They are a lost cause with 100x the footprint of a normal person. Most countries have trains. I’m speaking about normal countries, not settler-colonialists ones who covered the land they emptied with low-density labyrinth like suburbs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Seriously how first world can you be? A car alone cost more money than most of the world yearly salary. Only westerners would think it’s necessary to live.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 3.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.5K

    Posts

  • 27K

    Comments

Community moderators