To me it feels like a matured Reddit. (At least most of the time 🙃)

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
14 points

I wish that a lot of communities would consolidate. It seems like there was such a rush, and all these people trying to stake out their homesteading claim, that the community with a capital C wasn’t able to develop. With reddit, subs would get big and shitty, then you’d see something like,“Hey, join us over at <fill in>. It’s like this sub, but with(out) <fill in>”. And that spinoff had enough momentum from the start to keep going.

I’m not a sports guy, but it’s like there are 30 NBA teams (I don’t know the number, don’t care, and irrelevant to what I’m attempting to stay). The first community should have been NBA@… until there are enough people visiting so that the fans of TEAMA can go create their own TEAMA@…. As things stand, instead of starting with 30 basketball fans having a common community to bullshit, we ended up with 30 communities with 1 person in each and often zero traffic.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

The approach you describe is what Beehaw, where users cannot create new communities, is/was doing

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

The one thing I’d object to with the sports example is that I don’t wanna see game day threads for teams I don’t care about, but I’m totally open to general discussion of the league, including about teams I don’t follow. If literally JUST the GDT were split off to the individual team communities I’d be cool with it.

But I totally agree with the over-fracturing of interests. Every now and then I’ll see someone make a “spinoff” of a mostly dead community, just to post 2 or 3 things and stop. It’d be better if they just posted that in the existing community even though it only aligned 90% as well as they’d hoped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Weren’t a lot of the sports team communities started by one person just like a lot of the “Only X pornstar” communities?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

With reddit, subs would get big and shitty, then you’d see something like,"Hey, join us over at . It’s like this sub, but with(out) ". And that spinoff had enough momentum from the start to keep going.

Except that’s not what happened. What you’re describing was very rare. The vast majority of the time, terrible subs with terrible mods or user bases stayed entrenched, alternatives never took off. The main sub would always get recommended, it was the one Google would show, it was the one that hit the front page, the small subs just never got that exposure and most dwindled.

It was a big issue people didn’t talk about much, and I like that Lemmy isn’t worrying about consolidating.

permalink
report
parent
reply

[Outdated, please look at pinned post] Casual Conversation

!casualconversation@lemmy.world

Create post

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you’ll make some friends in the process.


RULES

  • Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling
  • Encourage conversation in your post
  • Avoid controversial topics such as politics or societal debates
  • Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate
  • No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.
  • Respect privacy: Don’t ask for or share any personal information

Related discussion-focused communities

Community stats

  • 9

    Monthly active users

  • 482

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments