You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-1 points

I’d quite happily argue that the USSR never tried to implement it in the slightest.

Can you imagine the politburo actually fighting to give up their privileged position? I can’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

To be quite honest, it seems to me - and I can be wrong - that it simply substituted power of wealth for power of position. Where I live I know that during occupation people were deemed as important based on where they worked - because where they worked dictated what they could steal obtain, be it items, access or favors.

There always will be someone on top, one way or the other. In capitalist society, it’s the guy who has the most money. In co- … socialist…? society it’s the guy with most connections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Because there is not a way for communism to work… sounds great on paper but always ends the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Communism has never existed. What about it sounds good on paper but is separate from reality?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

There’s no way for people to work together without someone at top benefiting?

X.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

You can doubt it all you want, but communism’s fatal flaw is humans. They will always want more.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 8K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 266K

    Comments