You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-1 points

The USSR was a flawed form of Socialism, but was fundamentally Socialist

Was the rule of law strong enough that decisions were being made by the people, or were they being made by authoritarians? Because if key decisions weren’t being made by the people, it wasn’t socialist.

The Capitalists are the Oligarchs!

The Oligarchs are feudalists, not capitalists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes, it actually was. The Politburo had outsized power, but the local Soviets ran most things. Again, incredibly flawed, but still Socialist.

Oligarchs are not land owners that take a portion of what food is grown by the Russian people, the Oligarchs are Capitalists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Oligarchs are not land owners

Oligarchs control the exploitation of Russia’s natural resources. Can’t get much more “land owner” than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Capitalists can do that as well, without being feudalists. You’re tying an ancient peasant-aristocrat structure to modern Capitalism just to avoid acknowledging that Capitalism has failed Russia.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 8K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 266K

    Comments