You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
34 points

Some banks are still running windows 98 internally, admitedly so long as said system isnt connected to the internet it should be fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Lol, not to mention Cobalt and other horrors that are lurking in Legacy systems no one has looked at in 50 years.

I’m thinking mainframe terminals, where the character has to be in the right place on the screen in order to store something in RAM.

Even worse, how many systems are still using punch cards? How often do those cards need to be replaced?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m glad you’re liking it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Win 98

This isn’t true, this can’t be true and I refuse to believe it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I sincerely hope that your local ATM never crashes and you never have to see the windows xp logo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

@xavier666 @vaultdweler13, it’s true, For internal use with PCs connected to the central server itself and not to the network, it is used for compatibility with corporate software, sometimes still very old Windows. This, when using it on the one hand only in a specialized way and on the other hand only locally, is more than enough. The same in factories in production for the automation of some valve or machinery with repetitive processes, a super-pc with a NASA OS is not needed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

For PCs at workshop, I can understand Win98. The OS is just a bootloader to a single application. But for banking, it’s a terrible security hazard.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 7.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 266K

    Comments