White House urges developers to dump C and C++::Biden administration calls for developers to embrace memory-safe programing languages and move away from those that cause buffer overflows and other memory access vulnerabilities.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
75 points

I’m not sure what to think about this. It’s bizarre, the White House making any recommendations on programming languages.

They’re definitely not seen as an authority in this field. Why would anyone care what recommendation they make? And so why make one at all?

permalink
report
reply
65 points

They’re definitely not seen as an authority in this field. Why would anyone care what recommendation they make?

It’s possible that they are acting on the advice of advisors who are authorities in this field.

And so why make one at all?

I expect it’s because information and industrial security are components of national security, which is of great concern to them, and those things depend on software.

I’m not surprised to see this, given that state-sponsored electronic attacks are on the rise these days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This is exactly why people sound sophomoric when they say “lobbying needs to go!” There are some drastic problems with lobbying as it is allowed now, but the last thing we need is the government regulating things they know nothing about without the input of experts. On top of that, it’s nonsense that I can’t pass my local councilman on the street and stop and push them to spend more time addressing important issues like climate change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’s important to remember that the argument against lobbying isn’t about the broadest sense of the word “lobbying”, but rather about corporations and other moneyed interests having unfair and unhealthy influence over the laws that govern everyone else.

The people who decry lobbying probably agree with you; they’re just using the word in an implicitly narrow context.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t think your argument quite holds up. The directionality is important. It’s true that the government can’t always know about technical things directly, but I think it’s fine for the government to be expected to know which experts they need to consult, and for that process not to just be open to everyone (which just means more open to those with more money).

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

It’s a national security threat

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

C/C++ is a threat to mental stability

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

NIST are the experts guiding the White House.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

NIST is mentioned

confused and angry screaming

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

There have been words around this, like how software should be safe by design, but the regulation should come from the governing entity. This is simply materialized now, but there has been momentum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They can’t even figure out language for human interpretation much less computer interpretation.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 543K

    Comments