763

Unpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specification(vivaldi.com)

posted
by
Avatar
Techie@lemmy.world
in
Avatar
technology@lemmy.world
91 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
shalva97@lemmy.sdfeu.org
2 points

Sometimes I wonder if people never blocked adds, would websites have less adds?

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Tad Lispy@chaos.social
1 point

It would add to adds 🤣 @shalva97 @joe

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
1 point

I believe there would be the same amount, or possibly more ads, but more targeted and more intrusive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
shalva97@lemmy.sdfeu.org
1 point

But that would make websites with less adds more popular. Maybe it would increase the number of websites that just show enough adds to support their servers… I don’t know maybe it will be very small percentage, but at least not 0

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 505K

    Comments

Community moderators