You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
141 points
*

I hate to be that guy, but it doesn’t seem like there’s anything to this fork. At least a few links in the README don’t work, and the domain for the “email” is actively for sale. The owner of the repository doesn’t seem to have any real previous projects on their GitHub account.

I can understand that it’s a new fork, but in my mind you’d want to at least make sure the Readme is… passable before you spread the word and make a Patreon for the project.

EDIT: The Patreon link has been removed since I made this comment. I’m still incredibly skeptical of the project though

permalink
report
reply
73 points
*

I would say don’t make a freaking patreon for it. You know what companies hate even more than people using thier IPs? Getting money while doing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

This looks like a straight cash grab. I bet the whoever owns this github won’t work on it at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

Nah fuck that, let’s all make a patreon for every. single. fork.

Let’s see if Nintendo’s unlimited legal budget is unlimited or ISP “unlimited”

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

They have a bunch of lawyers inhouse who do this as part of their day job. Sending a cease & desist to github and patreon costs them nothing extra, and neither of those will fight Nintendo in court to protect IP infringements.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You have fun with that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Go ahead, be the change you want to see.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

Yeah… I looked at the project’s subreddit, and I don’t expect it to last long. The creator’s idea of avoiding Nintendo’s legal team boils down to “assert emulation is legal and condemn piracy within our dev team and community.”

I don’t mean to be a dick, but I don’t think the guy knows what he’s doing. The only way an actively-maintained fork is going to avoid the same fate is if they either give up before Nintendo cares, or:

  • Stripped out the code that gave Nintendo’s argument validity in the first place;
  • Did not make money off the project; and
  • Stayed far the hell away from retail game emulation, focusing on perfect compatibility for homebrew entirely.

 

Even then, there’s a good chance they’re screwed either way. The original Yuzu devs agreed to Nintendo’s terms of explicitly naming Yuzu as a circumvention tool. Settlements don’t serve as precedent, but I suspect it’s going to be extremely hard to argue that a minimal derivative of a circumvention tool is not still a circumvention tool when the original creators stated they designed it as such.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yep. We need a separate completely anonymous “pastebin special” program that can decrypt these games.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
8 points

I’m sure a lot of forks will pop up right around this time. I’ll be less skeptical of them once I see actual commits made to the codebase instead of things like just changing the readme

permalink
report
parent
reply

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Create post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others


Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.


Community stats

  • 5.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.1K

    Posts

  • 74K

    Comments