Terrorists is just code for Arabs attacking civilians. Non-arabs attacking Arab civilians, it’s called “the U.S. military” or “IDF”.

Only one side gets called “terrorist” though.

Why do you think that is?

Does that make it ok? Answer: no. It doesn’t.

Listen, its their Gulf of Adan, they can do what they want. Its called National Sovereignty.

Do you see anyone telling Americans what they can do in their Gulf of Mexico? Of course not. Invade Haiti. Bomb Grenada. Embargo Cuba for 60 years. That’s called 2nd Amendment Rights, bucko. Maybe learn to read a copy of the US motherfucking Constitution.

But a couple of Arabs want to fire off a few bottle rockets in their backyard and suddenly the Liberal Nanny State has to pull up on the coast and tell them to cut it out? Get lost Grandpa Biden. You’re not the boss here. You can’t even find Mecca on a map.

Did I say any of the things you listed were ok either? Its not “bottle rockets”. Innocent people lost their lives.

You’re lucky you’re priveleged enough to be able to maintain such a heartless worldview. I hope nothing so awful ever happens to you or those you love.

And yes, I do know where Mecca is. Its in Saudi Arabia next to the Red Sea. If you want to fight strawmen, then turn off the computer and go outside.

So you agree that war is barbaric and soldiers are terrorists? Something we can agree on.

“Terrorists”

The Palestinians have a right to struggle against their occupiers by all available means, including armed struggle.

Hey now, when they’re attacking Evil Russian Soviets in the mountains of Afghanistan, I like to call those Princes of the House of Saud my friends.

This Post Is Dedicated To The Brave Mujaheddin Fighters of Afghanistan

In case you’re confused this is a reference to a Rambo movie that had this lovely dedication.

Its funny, because it actually didn’t have this. (Or, literally this)

https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/28476/have-the-ending-credits-of-rambo-iii-been-changed

Original sources from the time of the movie’s release, 1988, state that the film is dedicated to the “gallant people of Afghanistan”.

The edited end-card was made as a joke, back in 2004, and circulated so many times online that it eventually became headcannon.

That’s an interesting fact, but honestly it might as well really have had this endcard, since the movie openly glorifies the mujahedeen anyways.

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

We will continue attacks in Red Sea until a Gaza ceasefire – Yemen Houthi spokesman(odysee.com)

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Rules:

Community stats

Community moderators