You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

The intended effect was to create a revenue stream for traditional media players, so saying “our way or we’re out” is, in fact, an attempt to coerce the outcome they want.

tbh I’m kind of hoping fb and google stick to their guns if only so that it solidifies their reputation as a source only for misinformation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Fair enough, but I feel like part of the intended implication of the law is that if Meta and Google are unwilling to pay, that they would leave.like that outcome was definitely anticipated before the law was signed. They even did the same in Aus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They even did the same in Aus

Second person I’ve had to say this to- this isn’t reddit, you clearly need to read the article as you’re spreading misinformation

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The problem is, they will still distribute foxnews and every nonCanadian news.

Which will replace everything they are removing ATM.

permalink
report
parent
reply

You make a good point in that it could open the doors to better alternatives for search engines/social media as a news source, similar to how Reddit’s management is causing many users to seek out alternatives (ie Lemmy).

I’d be curious to know if there are any solid decentralized search engines and if that’s even feasible.

permalink
report
parent
reply

CanadaPolitics

!canadapolitics@lemmy.ca

Create post

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules:

All of Lemmy.ca’s rules apply

  • No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  • Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  • No porn.
  • No Ads / Spamming.

Community stats

  • 94

    Monthly active users

  • 1.4K

    Posts

  • 3.7K

    Comments