40

How certain are we that Discovery went to THE future rather than A future?

posted
*
by
Avatar
r_thndr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
in
Avatar
daystrominstitute@startrek.website
16 comments
hidereport

Many times Star Trek has taken us to the future only to reset the status quo at the end of the story arc. Tapestry (but in reverse?), that time Voyager crashed in the ice, and all that.

How likely is it that Discovery went to a mutable future, just one of many, especially with the Temporal Cold War, Carl, Q, Trelane, Janeway, the HMS Bounty, and any number of other temporally active agents out there in time? How locked in is the 32nd Century?

Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
Avatar
Ljdawson (Sync dev)@lemmy.world
3 points

Did you edit the title in sync by any chance?

Just fixed that bug…

permalink
report
reply
Avatar
r_thndr@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
2 points

I did not (that I can remember). But I did post this using Sync, between hotfixes I think.

Thanks for the great app work. Rock on!

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Ljdawson (Sync dev)@lemmy.world
2 points

(シ_ _)シ

permalink
report
parent
reply

Daystrom Institute

!daystrominstitute@startrek.website

Create post

Welcome to Daystrom Institute!

Serious, in-depth discussion about Star Trek from both in-universe and real world perspectives.

Read more about how to comment at Daystrom.

Rules

1. Explain your reasoning

All threads and comments submitted to the Daystrom Institute must contain an explanation of the reasoning put forth.

2. No whinging, jokes, memes, and other shallow content.

This entire community has a “serious tag” on it. Shitposts are encouraged in Risa.

3. Be diplomatic.

Participate in a courteous, objective, and open-minded fashion. Be nice to other posters and the people who make Star Trek. Disagree respectfully and don’t gatekeep.

4. Assume good faith.

Assume good faith. Give other posters the benefit of the doubt, but report them if you genuinely believe they are trolling. Don’t whine about “politics.”

5. Tag spoilers.

Historically Daystrom has not had a spoiler policy, so you may encounter untagged spoilers here. Ultimately, avoiding online discussion until you are caught up is the only certain way to avoid spoilers.

6. Stay on-topic.

Threads must discuss Star Trek. Comments must discuss the topic raised in the original post.

Episode Guides

The /r/DaystromInstitute wiki held a number of popular Star Trek watch guides. We have rehosted them here:

Community stats

  • 76

    Monthly active users

  • 159

    Posts

  • 765

    Comments

Community moderators