First of all: least unpopular. Neither of them are very popular and most people would prefer that neither of them were amongst the two options.

Second, valid criticism ≠ voting against, not voting or telling anyone to do either.

That’s completely fair critism is a healthy part of democracy.

I don’t think that.

What do YOU think will work?

Eating won’t fix cancer, so don’t bother.

My guy: sometimes you do things to prevent new problems. Making nothing better still beats making everything worse.

There’s a lot of good and bad.

Bad - Supporting Israel financially, forcing the rail workers back to work from their strike, his environmental policies seem half hearted.

Good - Forgiving large amounts of student loan debt, having his cabinet work with the DEA at reclassifing weed while promoting the idea publically, putting billions into Urban reconstruction to help cities become less dependent on roads and more accessible for the least fortunate.

It’s more nuanced than he’s great or awful. He’s just better. As it often ends up coming to in American politics.

As an aside I long for multi choice voting.

an incredibly obsessed fan, usually to an unhealthy degree, but often used ironically to just mean “big fan”. named after the character stan from the eminem song stan.

It’s basically a synonym for simp.

“an overzealous or obsessive fan of a particular person or thing”

Have you ever heard the Eminem song stan?