You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
58 points
*

That’s not really it. You need something that measures the state of the electron. Merely looking in the direction is not enough. It has to be something that interacts with the electron.

A camera alone isn’t enough. But light (eg photons) with enough energy should be enough. But then that energy will manipulate the electron. If you had a completely dark room and pointed a camera at the experiment it wouldn’t change anything.

It’s kind of like having your cake and eating it too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Yeah, it turns out that slapping the electron around like with a big stick or whatever causes it to change its behavior, go figure! :-P

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Dammit Jim, I’m a psychologist, not a physicist!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So if we didn’t need light to see it then it would continue doing whatever it does?

I wonder how the universe would look if we didn’t need light to see 🤔

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

but light is seeing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.6K

    Posts

  • 89K

    Comments