“There’s this wild disconnect between what people are experiencing and what economists are experiencing,” says Nikki Cimino, a recruiter in Denver.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
192 points

There’s a term for this, HENRY. High Earner, Not Rich Yet. The lie is the “Yet”. Millennials and Gen Xers have been struggling to reach the middle class that is kept perpetually out of reach. They have given up on the idea of financial solvency and are going into debt to indulge in luxuries like having children, going on vacations, and living somewhere that isn’t a complete shithole. Saving for retirement is as realistic as training to live on Mars, so why bother? Keep digging a financial hole and then lie down and die in it.

permalink
report
reply
112 points

Gen X here and I can’t afford to contribute to my retirement. Even had to withdraw some during unemployment. I’m either working until I die or hoping assisted suicide becomes legal in 20 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
79 points

Yep. Same. I do pretty good for myself and I’m more fortunate than most, but I had to borrow money from my dad recently for a series of expenses I couldn’t absorb in real time. I got the “you don’t know how to budget” sermon. It felt as fun as you’d expect

I said fuck it and gave him a list of earnings and expenses (I’m pretty frugal) and he was like, “oh…”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh hey, this is what my partner and I have been experiencing for the last year or so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Did he clap afterwards?

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Gen Millennial here. I can assist you on your suicide that day for a hot meal so I can at least eat on that day. Maybe someone from Gen Z can assist my suicide if I leave him my blanket then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

A hot meal? If you’re eating the person who just suicided then you could probably stretch those left overs out for at least a week or two.

You might be on to something here…

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

assisted suicide

Is that when you die but take a billionaire with you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

On the bright side, 9mm is cheaper than a retirement home. Somebody’s getting a blowjob on my 60th birthday, and it ain’t gonna be me!

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Damn, that’s dark. Like my favourite kind of humour.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

X here too, 53yo, cannot contribute to retirement. At 67 I will have to sell my house because I’ll not be able to afford taxes, insurances, power, repair, etc

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Assisted suicide vs… illegal suicide? What’s the difference?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Illegal doesn’t pay out insurance claims. Not that I can afford life insurance….

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

I might be “rich” when my parents die, depending on how much elder care they need.

I’m actually kind of looking forward to the day I look my kids in the eye and say “I’m going out to look for firewood” and just walk out into the snow and die.

But there won’t be any snow anymore so I’ll just wander off into a slightly chilly night.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

slightly chilly night.

You’re a glass half full kind of person, aren’t you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

What if we just financed all our kids advantages on our own credit for them and then promptly died?

What would happen to the debt?

Say I max out my credit card for their down payment on a house and then go “get firewood”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They definitely try to track large cash gifts when putting down a down payment on a house.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Then the credit card companies crank their interest rates higher and restrict the credit they extend to your kids to compensate. It’s not “free money.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’d rather look forward to the improvements in technology that make elder care less expensive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

As if regular people can afford whatever improvements happen

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You should watch the movie The Road if you haven’t already.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-95 points
*

What most people don’t realize is that once you have excess income, you have options. What you do with the excess is what matters. If you don’t save and invest it, you’ll be living paycheck to paycheck for the rest of your life.

A lot of folks think being rich means just spending money on whatever you want. That’s not really the case. If you spend the excess on fancy cars or luxury items that make others think you’re rich, the irony is you’ll be working for a long time and never actually become financially independent.

Edit: well, if I’ve learned anything from this comment, it’s that everyone on Lemmy identifies as a HENRY with bad spending habits no matter how much money they make. Or, at least a temporarily embarrassed one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

Except that’s not at all what OP said or was implying. Nice way of pushing the blame on the people affected rather than the broken system we live in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Both can be true. There are many people who barely (or don’t) make enough to survive. There are also many people who spend money frivolously and then complain that they’re broke because of the economy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Most people are struggling with the basics, not disputing that. But, then I wouldn’t consider those people HENRYs.

When I look around, I also see a lot of people with high income making boneheaded moves like buying expensive vehicles, renting luxury apartments, etc. For some people the problem isn’t the system, it’s their own lack of self-control or planning. If you’re making $200,000 and still feel broke. Maybe that $1,500/month car payment was a mistake. Maybe you shouldn’t have used the raise to move into a luxury apartment building.

When I was starting my career all my coworkers lived in $2200/month luxury buildings. I knew we all made roughly the same amount of money, so was shocked that they would pay this much for rent. Meanwhile, I sought out roommates and paid $650. With the money I saved, I paid off my student loan debt aggressively. Now all these people are struggling to get to the next step in life. Yeah, I could’ve seen that coming 10 years ago for you.

I see the same thing with cars. Everyone wants to own some luxury SUV. And, they make fun of me for driving a Prius. I won’t be surprised in another 10 years when they’re still struggling.

This isn’t an attack on people who don’t have the money. This is an attack on people who do and can’t plan well, but then act surprised when they’re broke still.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Dude, i pay near $400 a month in just student loan payments. I had to buy a “new” car last year and this 8 year old Subaru cost me $360 a month. I could have bought another $4000 beater, but that’s a hole you never get out of because you are constantly having to replace cars that aren’t worth the scrap they are made of. Everyone has been on a knifes edge for the past 16 years and now everything costs double from them but wages have been the same. No amount of budgeting is gonna fix that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Didn’t you just say you improved your budget situation by buying a more reliable car?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-27 points

I didn’t say that… my comment isn’t directed at people who are living paycheck to paycheck. It’s directed at people who think they should be rich because they have a high income, yet always seem to have found some unnecessary thing to spend their money on, which prevents them from building wealth.

If you’re always struggling to pay your bills, you need to increase your income. Not saying it’s your fault, just that practically that’s the best thing you can do for yourself in an imperfect system rigged against everyone but the very rich.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

If you don’t save and invest it, you’ll be living paycheck to paycheck for the rest of your life.

I don’t think you really know what “living paycheck to paycheck” actually means if you think it, in any way, involves investing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I think his point is people are only living paycheck to paycheck out of choice when they could save and invest if they tightened their belts.

Not saying I agree, just explaining his perspective.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You can have very high income and still live paycheck to paycheck if you spend every paycheck

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

Every time ive tried investing, i had to take it out after a few months to pay for something thats popped up in life after other things have raided my savings.

Investing is for people with a lot of excess cash.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I don’t know your situation, but investing is riskier than a savings account, that currently yeilds a high interest rate.

If you need an emergency fund, make one in a high yield savings account first. My rough number is $10,000. “You’re missing out on the gains” is an incredibly shortsighted view people have in the stock market. “Gains” are made over 20 year periods.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Precisely, which is why I don’t think my comment is directed at you. If you’re always trying to get ahead of the latest unexpected big expense, you’re not a “HENRY.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

What are those “somethings” that pop up every few months?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

This is really stupid.

You’re basically telling people “just be rich” like it’s that simple.

People living paycheck-to-paycheck are not able to invest money because they don’t have excess income, they get to decide if they want to pay for rent or want to pay for food. Combine that with astonishing inflation rates and salary raises that don’t match cost of living increases or simply layoffs, and we have one fucked up situation.

This is a systemic problem. Billionaires shouldn’t exist. Billionaires are a societal problem.

edit: Oh, I see your comment isn’t directed at people living paycheck-to-paycheck, that’s a bit more reasonable then but I still think you’re missing the mark. It’s not as simple as “just increase your income” like you seem to be thinking it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The problem in this thread is that there are people - such as the one mentioned in the title of this article - that are living paycheck-to-paycheck by choice. They choose to spend their entire paycheck on stuff. They don’t need to spend it all, they could save some, but instead they buy the biggest houses they can afford or build a deck they don’t actually need.

There are people who would literally die if they tried to significantly reduce their spending. Those are the people who don’t have a choice, and I sympathize with them and want solutions for this because it’s a serious problem. The others I have somewhat less sympathy for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

because it is that simple.

be rich or forever be poor.

this is the system we have setup and the system that we worship.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

I try to save whatever extra I have, because everyone says I need to have six months of expenses saved.

The problem is that before I can save up enough to cover that there’s some huge expense that I need to cover that empties it out and puts me even more into debt.

If I could manage to save up a year of expenses, I could probably start my own consulting agency and start making a lot of money, but I just can’t get there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The problem is that for many folks the amount they are making isn’t enough for them to live a very reasonable life AND they have nothing to invest in the first place. Suppose a household in a given area needs $100,000 to afford a VERY modest house in that area, health insurance, savings, healthy food etc. Now suppose the house has one disabled breadwinner and one fellow working for $40,000.

Because of this they live in shit town in a tiny apartment a building full of drug addicts in a not so great part of the state wherein the average life expectancy is about 10 years less than one of the good parts of the country.

The first 40k of “excess” would be spent on having a decent life, working a sane number of hours, moving into an actual home. For fully half the country the idea of having excess is laughable. It’s a crass joke.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

My SO has a medical condition that limits her income. I’m in academia, so I don’t make much and work crazy hours. We get to have happy day to day, and save money to invest by renting a shity apartment. As in, my investment account is worth more than that of some friends in software development, cus they wanted to live in good apartments.

It doesn’t matter that average life expectancy is 10 years shorter. It matters why. Are people randomly getting murdered or constantly exposed to high air pollution? Don’t live there. Is it shorter cus they are mostly stupid fucks that eat shity food and their only hobby is smoking on the bench below the building? You can live there fine, those are my neighboors. Doesn’t stop me from eating healthy home made food, staying in shape and saving money.

Am I happy about it? No, I will never own a house, and it sucks cus I love to tinker, and enjoy growing plants. But I can live a full filling live, better than any king that ever lived up till around the 18-19 century, and save money.

The economic system is dead, it died in 2008. Combine that with climate change, and things are only going to get worse. Unless some politician is going to pull out free, infinite, energy machine out of their arse they can’t do much as the system is already collapsing.

You can be smart about it, and have a few more happy years before we all die. Or you can be stupid about it, and suffer till we all die.

  • am not a USA citizen, the problem is global.
permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Most areas don’t need $100,000 a year to afford a “very modest house”, you could get a nice mobile home and afford to pay off the loan in just a couple years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Ah the ol’ deserving poor schtick. Classic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

OP is like: Even if you have highly-valuable skills, you can’t get ahead, because the game is stacked in favor of renting out your assets instead of delivering valuable labor.

Reply is like: Yeah, but have you considered renting out your assets though?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Come up with a better idea besides complaining.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

what the heck’s a rimjob?

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 466K

    Comments