The White House has approved nearly $144 billion in federal loan forgiveness for about 4 million borrowers in total, according to the administration.

President Joe Biden announced Thursday that the White Househas approved the cancellation of nearly $6 billion in federal student debt for thousands of public service workers.

The 78,000 eligible public service workers include teachers, nurses and firefighters, according to the White House.

It’s the latest student debt cancellation move through Public Service Loan Forgiveness programs, which allow eligible borrowers to have their remaining debt forgiven if they have made a certain number of payments and are working for approved employers.

Last year, the Supreme Court invalidated Biden’s more far-reaching student loan debt relief plan, arguing that it was unlawful because Congress did not explicitly approve the move.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-14 points
*

My issue is that these are years overdue, how does this man have a press conference every month about student loans, and every time its loans that would have been cancelled without him or should have been cancelled years ago. Which begs the next question, is it a win that it took three years in office to fix this? And next month when a new student loan press release comes out, what will be different?

Edited to Add because I already see downvotes and people think I am being excessive: March: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/03/21/statement-from-president-joe-biden-on-nearly-6-billion-in-student-debt-cancellation-for-78000-public-service-workers/

Feb: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/02/21/fact-sheet-president-biden-cancels-student-debt-for-more-than-150000-student-loan-borrowers-ahead-of-schedule/

Jan: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/01/19/statement-by-president-joe-biden-on-nearly-5-billion-in-additional-student-debt-cancellation-for-74000-borrowers/

Dec: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/12/06/statement-from-president-joe-biden-on-another-nearly-5-billion-in-debt-relief-for-over-80000-student-loan-borrowers/

No comment for November, I guess to avoid reminding people their loan repayments started.

Oct: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/10/04/president-biden-announces-an-additional-9-billion-in-student-debt-relief-for-125000-americans/

Sep: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/09/09/what-they-are-reading-in-the-states-more-than-4-million-student-loan-borrowers-enrolled-in-new-biden-harris-administration-save-plan/

Aug: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/08/22/fact-sheet-the-biden-harris-administration-launches-the-save-plan-the-most-affordable-student-loan-repayment-plan-ever-to-lower-monthly-payments-for-millions-of-borrowers/

Jul: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/07/14/statement-from-president-joe-biden-on-new-student-debt-relief-actions/

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Wait, are you seriously contending that making significant progress on repairing something that’s fundamentally broken and affects a large amount of people for an extended time isn’t a massively positive thing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-31 points

I was promised sweeping changes and got more of the same except with trumpets (press releases), the emperor has no clothes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

If it was so broken before that people who had earned it weren’t getting the benefit and now they are, that’s “more of the same”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

wanted chocolate and got strawberry

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Dude tried a big one-and-done executive order, but the GOP Supreme Court swatted it down. That was pretty big news. So now he has to do the slower process of auditing lots of little opportunities in programs, departments, and laws that were ignored by his predecessors. And that takes time.

And they need to make press releases every damn time because Americans are not good at understanding nuance and cumulative impact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

One thing to remember is the supreme Court blocked him from cancelling all student debt.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/30/politics/supreme-court-student-loan-forgiveness-biden/index.html

So the timeline (from my memory as I recall it):

  • forgiveness program introduced several administrations ago for public service workers
  • Trump administration found to essentially not forgiving any loans over technicalities
  • Biden comes into office with promise to correct
  • Biden tries to correct in 2022
  • GOP sues
  • Supreme court blocks Biden’s efforts in 2023, stating their method was overstepping their powers
  • Biden administration uses existing executive powers to move forward with efforts
permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

Could you provide sources for points 2 and 3? The Trump admin actually tried to simplify all the programs into just two, standard and IBR (income based repayment like the SAVE plan) and allowed for processing of cancellations. That administration also managed to use their executive power to eliminate student loan debt for disabled veterans source. Since then Biden has managed to ignore legal advice and precedent to throw up his hands and say he can’t do anything for student loans. The same individual says he will stop Israel by never stopping them, it’s tiring to hear people still have any faith in his words when is whole history is talking out both sides of his mouth. He was cancelled from running for president in 1988 for being a liar NYT Video and yet if I say he is lying, everyone jumps down my throat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Yes they should have been cancelled years ago, and every other administration that could, didn’t, or did it slowly. He is. Paperwork takes time, so is likely running through backlog.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I’ll give him this; previous presidents weren’t getting it done. Even though it was law. So yeah on one hand, yay he’s following the law… On the other hand this program has been cursed since Bush jr.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

You’re getting downvotes bc the pro-fasch shltbots are out in full force , not bc anyone is mAkInG a LoGicAl aRGuMent.

Their work shifts got doubled when people came here from Reddit. Social media is choked with this opinion-influencing bs

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Yeah, everything I’m seeing is we’re catching up to where we should have been years ago.

Which is better than ignoring it for another decade.

But it’s like being grateful some guy stopped kicking you in the nuts every five minutes and is only kicking the other 9 people in the nuts now.

Like, sure, I’d be happy it stopped. But still pissed it was happening to me and still happening to other people.

Plus it just feels like Biden is intentionally misrepresenting what is happening so he gets the best optics going into an election. He’s doing pretty much the bare minimum of the right thing for the wrong reasons.

Which again, is better than nothing.

But it’s not enough for him to be doing victory laps and calling himself the most progressive president ever.

All he did was stop kicking a few of us in the nuts every five minutes.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments