Setting aside the usual arguments on the anti- and pro-AI art debate and the nature of creativity itself, perhaps the negative reaction that the Redditor encountered is part of a sea change in opinion among many people that think corporate AI platforms are exploitive and extractive in nature because their datasets rely on copyrighted material without the original artists’ permission. And that’s without getting into AI’s negative drag on the environment.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-1 points

I think AI art looks neat

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That won’t get you into art school but it also won’t get you kicked out.

*adjusts horn-rims* yesyes very neat do you have anything else to say but that you’re whimsical?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

There are so many possibilities for AI art, to say it’s all bad is painting it all with one brush

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Are the Koalas here in the room right now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That isn’t art. That’s just commodity.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 507K

    Comments