Lemdro.id

-1 points

10 months ago

No, you don’t. Especially since you swapped it for a strawman which you also dont understand. This, just like the definition of a paradox, isn’t up for debate. This paradox has existed for thousands of years and predates the Christian god itself. You are not “magically” smarter than the greatest philosophers of history, you are just far more arrogant.

Cheers bud.

report

[ - ]

NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world

0 points

10 months ago

And you bud seem to like to run with the authority fallacy instead of deconstructing my argument and showing it as false. A beacon of intelligence.

report

[ - ]

0 points

10 months ago

Coming from the person that thinks they are smarter than all of the collective philosophers from the past 2000 years. Rich.

report

[ - ]

NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world

0 points

10 months ago

Never said I was smarter than them. You must enjoy putting words in people’s mouths.

report

[ - ]

0 points

10 months ago

You know how Terrance Howard insists he knows that 1x1=2 and that he knows better than all of the greatest mathematicians in the world? That’s you right now.

They’ve all pondered the “obvious paradox” that you see right through. If you think “it isn’t a paradox at all it is just syntax mumbo jumbo” then you obviously think yourself to be smarter than them. That’s basic inference, any philosopher of your caliber would accept that basic logic

report

[ - ]

NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world

0 points

10 months ago

Keep digging yourself deeper and just citing some other philosopher as if they’re infallible instead of engaging with my arguments. If you have nothing to say of substance then stop wasting my time

report

[ - ]

1 point

10 months ago

I already refuted your “arguments” and repeating them won’t change anything Terrance. You aren’t going to make 1x1=2.

What’s more likely, you figured something out that philosophers have pondered for millennia, or you just can’t quite grasp the concept?

Come on Terrence, grow up. Just a little.

report