Oh God, my eyes.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
46 points

Advance?! I thought NATO was a defensive pact. Huh…

permalink
report
reply
26 points

They love to have it both ways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Cognitive dissonance is required for liberals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The two excuses that my well educated, well-heeled Burgerland lib peers have given me so far:

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Ukraine was in the coalition of the willing, yet they say Ukraine was pro-Russia before 2014.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Why didn’t Russia or China veto the UN Security Council resolution on Libya in 2011?

Never thought about it at the time, but seems weird that they simply abstained. Doubt that is what would occur today

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

While I cannot say for certain, I think there’s something to be said about them both maneuvering to get on the US’s good side in the post-cold-war, US total hegemony era of geopolitics.

Russia for its part really wanted to be part of NATO and join with western capitalism, something it was eventually denied and eventually realized it would never get.

China on the other hand still had the US as its largest trading partner and was trying to grow its productive forces and move up the value chain without drawing attention to itself or making itself a target or enemy of the US. To do that not getting in the way of US goals was probably necessary as if they started vetoing things like the old Soviet Union the attention and the anger and attacks on them likely would have started sooner. One can argue endlessly about what they should have done, the impacts, etc, it was simply caution on their part and biding their time while they built their own power and diversified their interests beyond the US and its vassals in Europe.

Basically everyone was letting the US do its thing and there’s a good chance we must remember that even without UN approval the US may very well have done many things anyways in the late 2000s/early 2010s in its position as hegemon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I wondered about that too. I’m guessing the US made some concessions to Russia in Libya.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They still tried to befriend the west at the time.

And they fucked up, Putin reacted only after seeing gaddafi killed.

permalink
report
parent
reply

GenZedong

!genzedong@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

  • No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
  • We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
  • If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
  • Unless it’s an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
  • For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
  • Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)

Community stats

  • 6

    Monthly active users

  • 2.7K

    Posts

  • 22K

    Comments