With the release of Baldur’s Gate 3, many gamers are wondering if they need to play the first two games before diving into the third. Here’s a breakdown of the plot of the previous 2 games.
You don’t need to have played them, but they’re the first and second best RPGs ever made so you definitely should, for that reason.
I keep hearing this, but i cannot get into Real time with Pause. Ive tried Tyranny for 8h, pillars 1 for close to 4h and im currently only getting through pillars 2 because it allows a turn based Mode.
I habe the feeling because RTWP was the norm back then, no game wasted time to explain the System so someone who is New. This makes it incredibly Hard for me to get into the System, and currently heavily discourages me to try Baldurs gate 1 and 2
Did you try… pausing…? Never understood people who complain about real time with pause when the power to stop the game completely is just part of combat and the name.
They’re fundamentally different systems. RTWP tends to be faster and more reactionary because everything happens at once. Turn-based is more strategic, because you can only react to things after they happen, but it is a lot slower.
RTWP games do tend to have auto-pause options that can be set up to simulate turn-based systems, but no amount of pausing will change the way the game plays when not paused.
Yeah i did but the true skill with RTWP is understanding when party members need to be moved. In my Limited experience its really Hard to Spot, when your in a disadvantageous Situation and youre losing the dps battle. In my case the difference in dps is often only spotted when the combat Has been going for a while, which in return means that a lot of the avoidable damage Has already been dealt
Sorry I’m coming in late, but one example I can give you is I absolutely hated having to lead my Fireballs because of casting time and the enemy running towards me with Haste and different movement speeds. No amount of Pause will change the imprecision.
(Liberal application of Web or Grease helped though, but I cannot stand RTWP for that reason).
Not a popular opinion, but I love RTWP, and was sad that BG3 didn’t offer the option. But I still struggle with the D&D action economy, and am forced to get better with it.
Same, I love RTWP and can’t stand slow turn based anymore, looking at each individual skeleton slowly take their action only for them to get oneshot in the next round drives me insane.
The pathfinder games do it best, you can toggle seamlessly between RTWP and turn based, meaning I can go through 80% of combat encounters easily in real time and then pause on tough fights if needed. Best of both worlds.
Rtwp wasn’t the norm as far as I remember, but manuals were. So the systems are explained in the manual, but not too well so there were a lot of online guides.
Anyway you are hardly the only person who dislikes rtwp, it’s a crutch system that tries to give you some control over a full party but ends up in a chaotic mess which is slower than a turn based game would be because you have to pause quite a lot.
I loved BG1/2 in spite of its systems, but I can’t play them today.
If you want to play them, I would suggest a low difficulty, and a lower game speed which both lessen the need to pause all the time. Also most of the party should be melee and archers, assign them the basic combat script so they can fight without too much babysitting.