Lemdro.id

1 point

7 months ago

Thinking that voting according to your ethics is totally and completely disconnected from the consequences is a privilege not everyone has. Your ideological purity might have the consequences of harming more marginalized people because in your search for an angel, you believed it was better to vote for the devil than a sinner.

Unless you’re telling me that you think your third-party candidates are absolutely perfect, you’re already voting in degrees of “less bad.” Why wouldn’t you vote for the “less bad” that is more likely to win?

report

[ - ]

0 points

7 months ago

Your ideological purity

I’m not advocating for purity so I don’t need perfect candidates. I’ll be happy if they just aren’t racist war criminals.

report

[ - ]

0 points

7 months ago

Thinking that voting according to your ethics is totally and completely disconnected from the consequences is a privilege not everyone has.

everyone can accept deontological ethics and choose to act in accordance with the categorical imperative. it takes no privilege at all.

report

[ - ]

1 point

7 months ago

It’s a privilege when you choose your ethics model over the real life consequences of others.

report

[ - ]

1 point

7 months ago

not doing the right thing because you’re afraid of the consequences is cowardice.

report

[ - ]

1 point

7 months ago

Amazing. Every word of what you just said was wrong.

I am a straight, cis, white male with a roof over my head, food in my refrigerator, and dogs I can afford to take to the vet. In your solipsistic worldview, there are hardly any consequences that I would have to face if Trump were elected. I’m choosing compassion.

In your mind, what is even the point of your ethics if it isn’t rooted in caring for and about other people.

report

[ - ]

1 point

7 months ago

what is even the point of your ethics if it isn’t rooted in caring for and about other people.

that’s what it is for me, but, again, i’m a deontologist (i think. i have been leaning toward nihilsm lately but it would be swell to be pulled back from that).

report

[ - ]

1 point

7 months ago

Well if it’s any help, Carl Sagan’s pale blue dot helps me to remember to be kinder to people. While understand how the vast emptiness of the Universe could make someone feel cold and alone, and like nothing really matters, most of the time, it encourages me to have a greater appreciation for everyone that is here. I don’t know if it comes from an evolutionary instinct to persist and extend my existence, or something else, but the rarity of life makes me root for us more. And I guess that’s why I believe living beings matter, and why I won’t accept an ethical paradigm that ignores consequences that hurt people.

I mean I agree with you that it is always the right time to do the right thing, but at some point, the rubber meets the road and lives are affected. Maybe the “right” thing to do is to teach a man to fish, but maybe I do that tomorrow once the man has the strength to cast a net, and for today, I just give him a fish. It doesn’t have to be all or nothing.

Anyway, I’m glad the tone of our conversation seems to be in a better place now than when we started.

report

[ - ]

-1 points

7 months ago

I think Cornel West is a good person and I think Jill Stein is a good person. so I’m probably going to vote for one of them. I think Biden and Trump are bad people, so I won’t be voting for either of them.

report