Scientists on Thursday published a paper identifying and naming the worm, which they said belonged to a previously-unidentified species.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
3 points

Wondering the consequences of reviving a 5000 year old worm species. I would imagine this would never make it back to the wild.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

46,000 year old it says

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Whoops, teaches me to read better. Better finish my coffee…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I was 50-50 between mistake and that you might have been going with “the earth is only 5000 years old” 😄

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science

!science@kbin.social

Create post

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on scientific discoveries, research, and theories across various fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and more. Whether you are a scientist, a science enthusiast, or simply curious about the world around us, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on a wide range of scientific topics. From the latest breakthroughs to historical discoveries and ongoing research, this category covers a wide range of topics related to science.

Community stats

  • 7

    Monthly active users

  • 778

    Posts

  • 928

    Comments

Community moderators