You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

Yes I understood that. My point is how often do you know you need to move a line exactly 17 lines? Do you count them? Clearly much slower than doing it interactively by holding down ctrl-shift-down for a bit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

You ain’t understanding it dog

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

I just look at the line number. If the code I want to edit is 17 lines up there’s a 17 next to it. My ide window looks like my comment. Normally an ide would look like this

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

As a vim user myself, I don’t understand why you need relative lines either. I can just as easily type :23 to go to line 23.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Mostly a matter of taste I think. One benefit is one less key press since relative keys shouldn’t need to press enter at the end of the command. I mostly use it because it came default with LazyVim.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Thoose are line numbers in IDE. You don’t count them, you see them

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Line numbers are absolute, not relative (normally anyway; I think some editors allow showing relative line numbers). Anyway I think holding down (page) up/down is going to be just as fast.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There are both modes for absolute and relative line numbers in vim. Holding up/down might be intuitive nd easy to remember, but saving 1 second everytime you need to do this can add up pretty fast

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmer_humor@programming.dev

Create post

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

  • Keep content in english
  • No advertisements
  • Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

Community stats

  • 8.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 43K

    Comments