You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
64 points

In defensive terms, no, not really. They had to build it like this because these aren’t really walls per se, it’s just brick lining on the outside of an earthen mound, and mounds are, well, mound-shaped. https://gomadnomad.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Bukharas-Ark-Palace.jpg

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’d think there’d be a reason beyond construction requirements, though—otherwise someone in the past 1,500 years would have replaced it with a more conventional wall.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

They did. This is only the oldest, innermost fortification in the city. AFAIK additional layers of walls were build around it later.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It would’ve made siege ladders harder to set up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Who needs siege ladders when you can just climb up the damn wall?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Mildly Interesting

!mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world

Create post

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it’s too interesting, it doesn’t belong. If it’s not interesting, it doesn’t belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh… what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don’t spam.

Community stats

  • 4K

    Monthly active users

  • 597

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments