I should clarify: laws that have actually passed.
Yes, when writing lengthy posts arguing semantics you should be clear and specify what you’re talking about.
You meant what you said, you just assumed and were called out.
You play more hopscotch with reading than my daughter at the playground, lol.
Even if I did, it changes fundamentally nothing about the overarching conclusion. This isn’t the gotcha you seem to believe it is. So says Confucius, when the wise man points at the moon, the fool looks at the finger.
Quit looking at pixels; look at the big picture.
Even if I did, it changes fundamentally nothing about the overarching conclusion.
You’re clearly the bad faith poster here.
You’re already in the thick of it but this guy is peak debatelord, he is really not worth engaging unless you feel like counting arguments like they’re points in a game.
Having actual, valid points instead of just vibes and twitter quips is debatelord?
