I dunno what the plural of “Manjaro” is.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

Manjaro offers a stable branch, pamac, upgrade snapshots, package manager, kernel manager, driver manager, and is optimized for LTS kernels. It takes a lot of the edge off Arch.

If that’s not something you need that’s fine. Some of us do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Packages delayed by a week or so is not “stable”, in either sense of the word

In fact, that can break things. Especially with AUR use

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They avoid releasing packages with outstanding bugs. So at least there’s that.

As for AUR… it’s really not a standard for stability in any shape or form. Heck, if AUR packages really didn’t work on Manjaro that would definitely improve its stability. 😄

But that’s really not proven (that they don’t work). All the ones I tried worked fine. YMMV. A third of AUR packages are abandoned or have never been updated after being added. There is no quality bar beyond “some random person decided to add a package”. I really don’t think we should use the AUR as proof of anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:
Community rules
  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 7.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 66K

    Comments