Comment by DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world on 93 Year Old Woman Arrested for Resisting Eviction

This is actually an older news story, and it does appear as though she recovered from this before her death.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/14389544

Follow for More

Go move to Cuba then.

Move to the bottom of a ditch.

Ahh, nice, cordial Lemmy interaction in the morning

Lemmy has the most death threats per user of any social media I’ve ever used. It’s kind of crazy. I guess that’s why user numbers keep trending down. Monthly active users are down 21% on July last year.

Yeah I have to say the political environment here is getting more and more exhausting as time goes on. Lemmy is developing a 4chan-esque reputation that will keep it from ever really taking off.

Kind of a bummer.

“Lemmy is politically hostile”

receives downvotes, insults, and death theats

Yeah……

For the purposes of this thread, I’m a commenter on Lemmy who’s tired of overtly hostile users harassing anyone who doesn’t align with their chosen stance.

Generally speaking, the idea isn’t to yell at the shitlibs unless they’re saying shitlib things. When they’re being polite enough you just hit them with history.

You don’t even know what a threat is.

Careful not to cut yourself on that edge.

dumb response to dumb comment

Weak troll. Troll harder

Mate, you condone calling people terrorists but consider edgy telling someone to move. I can’t troll a troll.

Nobody called anyone a terrorist. OP identified an economic ideology as terrorism.

And yeah, it’s middle-school-cringe-level edginess to simp for capitalism by telling someone else to move to a different country. Especially when that particular line of fallacious thinking was debunked decades ago.

If you’re feeling targeted by that comment calling out capitalism, that’s your deal; you’re free to be a capitalism fanboy, but just know that the billionaires will never love you back.

You are saying it as if it was a real suggestion. It was an attempt at equally ridiculous comment as calling our entire economic model terrorism.

Among the countries you could have picked, I could not think of one that better supports the idea that capitalism is terrorism the way Cuba has been harrassed for decades for essentially doing some pragmatic reforms - to the point they were forced to side with the USSR to prevent invasion by the US.

Fun Fact:

That happened in Vietnam too. And Libya. And Venezuela… And the Spanish Republic… And

Cuba is doing well despite brutal Imperialist sanctions from the US, but is not a developed country yet. People are driven by their Material Conditions, and are products of their Material Conditions, so it does not make sense to move from a developed to a developing country purely out of ideological purity.

Instead, people should try to shape the State they live in to be more equitable. Changing a Capitalist country to Socialist is a good thing.

Cuba that is self sufficient and has the best healthcare in the world? As well as the most beautiful beaches? Yeah it’s on my list if countries to flee to when Trump wins my dude.

Enjoy continuing to live in this shithole country.

If it is so great, why wait for Trump to win? A second time?

Cuba makes a huge amount of money from the tourism industry and it doesn’t all get redistributed to the people according to their needs. Just because a country calls itself a communist country doesn’t mean it’s true. Believe it or not, the DPRK is not actually democratic or a republic.

Cuba is absolutely a Socialist country. The vast majority of industry is centrally planned by the state. There have been some market reforms to help participate in the global economy after the dissolution of the USSR, but there isn’t a Borgeoisie class in power.

This is ideological purity taken beyond rational extremes, if you believe any amount of Capitalism in a country is sufficient to call it Capitalist, then you would disagree with Marx, who advocated for gradually building up the productive forces so that Communism can be meaningfully achieved, and which also requires global Socialism.

Let me tell you a little secret (that is a lie, it just basic logic). The reason every “communist country” is in name only is because a real one can’t exist. Not for any real length of time anyway. As long as the system requires humans to make decisions, they will make selfish decisions. And socialism just make it so much easier for few decision makers to take all the power.

Why would “making selfish decisions” be worse in a collectively owned system where industry is run by the public, than in a Capitalist system where the only decisions made are selfish ones?

What kind of purely vibes-based analysis is this?

So… capitalism is bad and if you do not like it, move to Cuba which is still capitalist?

yes, that is the stupidity of it. Saying you want to live in True Communism is like saying you want to live in Narnia. Might sound nice, but it is not possible

You were the one who said it though…

Wait, are you talking about socialism or communism?

Both. It applies to both if they are at the extreme end. Socialism has extra steps.

And to be absolutely clear, I mean socialism with no capitalistic elements. An in the middle system is what I am advocating from the start.

What are these “Capitalistic Elements” that mean you cannot have Socialism?

The greedy motivations of decision makers being aligned with prosperity for the people and separated from lawmaking power.

How do you make a successful company? Sell good cheap things to the people. You get filthy rich, but people have good cheap products to buy that would not exist otherwise. And they get their share in form of wages.

Government needs to be separate to be able to legislate worker protections such as minimal wage, work safety, etc.

Cuba is proof that capitalism is terrorism. Same with Venezuela.

Just as much as USSR and Stalin are proof socialism is genocide.

Thankfully, chances are the people taken care of would be psychos like you, who would kill people over internet comments ;)

Just Lemmy stuff 😃

Violent revolutions have only worked in rural areas.

true, at least she wouldn’t be in jail for the crime of not being able to work with 93

True. Go move then. Or any other non capitalist country.

No? Maybe those are worse than capitalism and we should try to fix it instead of calling everyone terrorists? Ok then.

nah, corporations are literally evil, as in no morals evil

Fire is also no morals evil. Corporations are tools. Dangerous but powerful tools. You use them poorly and you end up with corporations murdering union leaders and poisoning communities. You don’t use them at all and you end up with breadlines and authoritarianism.

Breadlines happened in the Great Depression. They happened because of Capitalism and Corporations.

nah, fire is just the propagation of exothermic reactions.

Corporations require intent, they are designed to literally strip any moral consideration from their actions.

PS: about that breadlines and authoritarianism, the US has had plenty of breadlines, and still does to this day, also authoritarians love corporations, after all corporations are inherently authoritarian.

Corporations don’t do moral consideration by their nature, just like fire. You can say it was “by design” for corporations and coincidence for fire, but that is a distinction without difference. Irrelevant for the argument.

And funnily enough, having many authoritarians in a system surprisingly results in much less authoritarian system than having just one. That is why the 3 branches of government are split and it is why I don’t know of any true democracy that is not capitalistic. The authoritarians keep each other in check.

Do you believe history is a real thing that impacts where countries are development-wise, or do you believe colonialism, imperialism, and destructive geopolitical policies are fake and do not exist?

Do you think that if Cuba turned Capitalist it would suddenly become a fully developed country like in Western Europe or America overnight? Why?

Then take a look at China as an example. Its explosive growth started when it embraced capitalism (authoritarian flavor, but capitalism). Before that it more or less stagnated. Capitalism is obviously not the only requirement but it is a necessary one.

China grew steadily under Mao, but was not an industrialized economy. Under Deng, Capitalistic market reforms took place and foreign Capital was brought in to speed up development, but as you’ve said, the State still maintains dominance over the economy.

Capitalism is not necessary for development. Humanity developed for thousands of years pre-Capitalism, which itself is only a few hundred years old. You do not require individual mini-dictators competing for higher and higher profits in order to develop, industry can be run by the collective.

It just can’t be at scale. Would be lovely if it could.

People who don’t own something have no incentive to improve it. A factory run by a collective will always prioritize wages over modernizing equipment etc.

People will not invest into new ventures if they don’t get profits, prioritizing luxuries/lifestyle instead.

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

–Be a Decent Human Being

–Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

–Posts must have something to do with the topic

–Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

–No NSFW content

–Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

93 Year Old Woman Arrested for Resisting Eviction(lemmy.world)

A Boring Dystopia

!aboringdystopia@lemmy.world

Community stats

Community moderators