Anti malware that can detect cracks and flag them as so, but can also distinguish from trojact and malware? Also, that can be configured to don't use too many resources when not required

posted 11 months ago

gemew26@lemmy.dbzer0.com

piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

I was thinking, mbam, have you got other suggestions for Windows 10? Also, is there a good setup for when I’m running games I bought, and I don’t need active scanning of threats? (Especially for legit games that use resources intensively)

Sort:

Hot Top Controversial New Old

You are viewing a single thread.

View all comments View context

[ - ]

RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com

7 points

11 months ago

If on Windows, Windows defender is more than enough for all of that stuff. It’s very effective, although does require an internet connection or it won’t do as well

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

mindlight@lemm.ee

0 points

11 months ago

Yes. But the discussion was about not running any since it killed performance.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

jnk@sh.itjust.works

4 points

11 months ago

Extremely case where I’m going to defend windows; but Ms Defender never killed performance in a pc even if i had a low-end one.

Considering all the bloatware windows has, OP would be better off fighting like literally every other program except Defender…

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

mindlight@lemm.ee

2 points

11 months ago

I fully agree.

But my main point was that they’re taking an extreme risk if they’re running without active antivirus and access the network in one or another way.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

jnk@sh.itjust.works

1 point

11 months ago

Oh i also agree with that, just wanted to clarify that

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

SpeedySparticus@feddit.dk

0 points

11 months ago

Not running antivirus does not put you in risk. Antivirus has a considerable impact on performance and does not prevent malware. What puts you at risk is running executables with malware which antivirus can only prevent if it is just some scriptkiddie trying to hack you. Real malware can’t be prevented by antivirus.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

mindlight@lemm.ee

0 points

11 months ago

Either you’re just ignorant or your working in the Russian malware industry.

Remote exploits doesn’t have anything to do with you running any infected executables. It’s about vulnerabilities in executables that you are running. Read up on the zx vulnerability or the log4j vulnerability.

One really really old attack vector is a buffer overflow attack. For example, if you’re running a clean VLC to watch a movie and your VLC is older than version 3.0.12 you’re at risk. The video file, that you “purchased” on PirateBay, could have been manipulated to crash VLC and force VLC run a specific payload in the video file. If that payload is ransomware it’s game over for you.

Yeah, just like wearing a seatbelt doesn’t guarantee that you don’t get injured, antivirus doesn’t guarantee that your computer won’t get infected.

But there’s no doubt about the usefulness of both seatbelt and antivirus.

permalink

report

parent

[ - ]

SpeedySparticus@feddit.dk

0 points

11 months ago

The liblzma vulnerability does not have have anything to do with antivirus. Running antivirus doesn’t help with that. Same goes for log4j. The liblzma and log4j vulnerabilities didn’t get detected by antivirus and it didn’t help prevent it. Remote exploits can also only happen if you either have some service exposed to the internet or visiting a malicious website with a vulnerable browser. Antivirus can only prevent scriptkiddies but any sophisticated malware will just bypass av

permalink

report

parent

Show more comments