You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
42 points

Isn’t this why we should embrace EVs and other cars that can use renewable energy so we don’t have to worry about the middle east and other petrostates?

permalink
report
reply
35 points

Evs make us reliant on lithium which just shifts the problem to another country. Additionally - the infrastructure is not there for evs.

I think the best alternative right now would be biodiesel hybrids and straight biodiesel vehicles and FUCKING SMALLER VEHICLES

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Public transportation.

The less of our lives we have to buy the less critical supply chain there is to “defend”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

It’s not that easy. Sprawl needs to be addressed. Our cities are build around cars. You can’t slap a few busses in a town expect shit to work.

I work an hour away from my home. I would take a train but there isnt one that is reliable or cheaper than driving.

Having a light rail system that connected the east coast would take centuries unless the government acted with unprecedented action and speed even then it would be decades.

I’d love more public transportation yes.

I am saying right off the bat I think biodiesel would be a more viable alternativ as it could be relatively easily adopted as the infrastructure is already in place.

Edit - I was probably a bit verbose when I wrote this. Clearly it won’t take centuries. Decade or two at the most

Edit two: I was also misinformed about biodiesel - thanks for the helpful information, I appreciate it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The best solution right now is to build out public and alternative transit. Busses, streetcars, lrt, greenways, woonerfs, etc are far superior and cheaper than anything we could figure out for cars.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Biodiesel is not a good option imo the NOx emmisions are generally significantly higher. Also most of the oil thats used to create biodiesel is not sourced responsibly. The production procces also still creates toxic waste although usually less than normal diesel.

Source: i just wrote a report on this if you’re really interested. i can dig through my sources lmk

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m mostly worried about the huge area consumption, tbh? Like, if you would replace all fossil oil with biodiesel, how much agricultural area would you need? Probably more than we have, I’d have to look it up, but it’s a lot for sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Biodiesel also is pretty destructive to the seals on the engine as it has higher levels of solvents the eat away at rubber. Renewable diesel is a better option, as it has higher cetane levels and can burn cleaner, and is designed as a drop in replacement for dino #2, though I don’t fully know how it’s sourced.

All I know is my truck ran like shit on B20 and not nearly as bad on R99. That, and the factory recommends reducing oil change and filter intervals by 50% on both bio and renewable. It’s a clusterfuck obscured by marketing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Fuck yeah in interested change my wrong ass and uninformed opinions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

How about better public infrastructure, like trains and tramlines? They don’t require lithium, and are fully electric.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yes, we are all in agreement on this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Accu trains and buses are also interesting for public transport. For trains it’s interesting for sections that can’t get electrified yet due to tunnel/bridge heights etc

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Batteries are still better because they can be recharged without oil or extra pollution.

You cant recharge an ICE engine without more pollution and oil

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

Where does your power come from? You don’t just plug into the wall and get magic clean energy. You are just shifting the shit elsewhere.

It’s a lie told to sell you a good and you are eating it up.

Less than 8% of energy consumption in the US comes from renewable energy. Another 8% come from nuclear.

That’s petrol / natural gas / coal powering your home, factories, shops, and restaurant. Natural gas is not green, it’s greenwashed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

‘Other Country’ being mainly China, which happens to sit on most of the lithium deposits on Earth if I am not mistaken.

Also to a lesser extent, Afghanistan. I remember a few years back a report of huge lithium deposits being found there but uh… yeah good luck with running that operation.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It’s actually Argentina and Chile, which tips that calculus in our favour given they’re friendly western developed nations.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/lithium-reserves-by-country

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

biofuels like ethanol? less efficient and more expensive, unfortunately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Biodiesel specifically due to it’s relatively clean manufacturing process. Cost not withstanding. Cost will go down as adoption improves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m a big fan of hydrogen for stuff like cars. Install more than enough solar or hydro or whatever, then use the surplus energy to create hydrogen cells that can be stored long-term, so that the hydrogen itself is also created with clean, renewable energy, usable on demand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I love hydrogen, but it’s a bit of a pain in the ass to transport and store.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean it’s just not generally energy efficient compared to batteries, and the majority of hydrogen tends to come about as a byproduct of, I think it’s propane and natural gas extraction and production. Electrolysis is pretty far off from being an effective competitor to batteries. I do still think that theoretically the specific energy is high enough that it doesn’t really matter, since that seems to be like the major limiting factor keeping electric from going mainstream, and me personally, I would probably also use the oxygen made by electrolysis for some cool rocket fuel cars, also cutting down on the lack of , but everyone’s against that because “The cars would explode you psycho/moron!” and other stupid idiot considerations that I don’t care about. But yeah, generally we don’t have enough of an energy excess to be able to run cars off of it in a reasonable way. Energy density still sucks also, but then, it’s not like modern cars tend to really use a lot of their space anyways, so I don’t think that matters too much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Bikes, bike infrastructure, and ebikes are about as carbon efficient as you can get without just straight up walking.

But they’re not really feasible for most people because few cities have enough protected bike lanes and sensible zoning to let it happen.

So we have much easier options.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Evs make us reliant on lithium

Oh no! No the third most abundant element in the universe! WTF are we gonna do? Use another metal with a large valency shell that makes it ideal as a dense storage medium for electrons? the horror

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Hey friend. For context I meant lithium from other countries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Lithium for now, there’s no guarantee that will continue, but in the short-medium term at least, yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Natrium is up and comming.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

…But im not attracted to the small ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m not saying that there isn’t a place for large vehicles but the tend of bigger bigger bigger needs to calm the fuck down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oddly enough emissions standards are one of the major reasons vehicles are getting so big.

In 2012 fuel economy standards were changed as a response to the manufacturers calling everything a truck to get around regulations (seriously - they classified the PT Cruiser as a truck in the 2000s). So now standards are weighted based on vehicle footprint instead of by class.

Notice how around 2012 was when the American auto manufacturers stopped making the old Rangers, S10s, Dakotas, etc? And now that the Ranger is back it’s as big as the older F-150s and the F-150s are the size of a small airport? And as the CAFE standards get tougher over time the vehicles keep growing?

It’s easier to just make the trucks bigger every refresh cycle than to make them more efficient, so that’s what they do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah that was a major oversight from the Obama administration. Feels bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I honestly doubt that. There aren’t really good alternatives to oil, but EVs just need any kind of accu and lithium-based accus are what’s most economic right now. Furthermore lithium doesn’t get consumed like oil and there gets research done into recycling it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Fair fair fair - a lot of good points have been made and I was misinformed about biodiesel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Yeah, EV’s are not, in themselves, the cure for our environmental woes. Too much electricity is still generated from fossil fuels for the carbon footprint to actually be diminished much and the environmental toll of mining for lithium also needs to be factored in. BUT, at the very least, it removes some dependence on oil in particular, where coal and natural gas are other forms of fossil fuels used to generate electricity. If nothing else, it takes some pressure off very specific regions, pressure which has contributed to invasion, war, international manipulation, extreme politics and oligarchies. It spreads the sources for resources around further.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Also it moves the burning of gas from millions of these poorly efficient vehicles to a single much more efficient power plant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well, yes, but also the efficiency of the EV’s will factor in as well. Less efficient EV means more power draw for the same miles. But with things like regenerative braking and no idling, even the least efficient EV is probably more efficient then the most efficient gas powered car.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Nuclear gang rise up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They’ll go for lithium or rare earths

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes. Glad somebody else gets it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

America always finds a reason for war. Shooting people is a national sport and too deeply ingrained in american culture.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think it’s naive to think that the imperial core will stop with the needless wars simply because oil is no longer the hot commodity. There’s always perverse interests to use the military for power projection and resource control.

Under your current voting system, this will never change.

I for one, refuse to be shipped off in our generation’s tribute to America. Our government (Australia) is still the US’ vassal state.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Lemmy Shitpost

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful

Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.


2. No Illegal Content

Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)


3. No Spam

Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.


4. No Porn/Explicit

Content


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.


5. No Enciting Harassment,

Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 250K

    Comments