You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
30 points

Using pronouns isn’t a “problem” though, it’s that people genuinely don’t care.

I don’t care very much if I’m honest. I’ve never interacted with someone who informed me that their pronouns were not the usual ones.

permalink
report
reply
68 points

It also never happened to me but I imagine the conversation would be something like:

Hello X

Please don’t call me X I don’t like it, call me Y instead

Ok

~ ~The end~ ~

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Okay imagine that… but with an internal crushing anxiety knowing that under best case there will be probably around five somewhat invasive follow up long answer questions either about your personal history or about trans people’s existence in general. Then an optional depressing thing people think is them being magnanimous where they say “I don’t get it but okay.” OR they look at you like you grew another head and walk swiftly away to watch/glare you with furtive long stares or try and speed run whatever brief social interaction you are participating in like you have the plague.

Aaaaand mental picture complete!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

“OK comrade!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points
*

You’d hope that.

But in my experience it’s a 50/50 chance they will go off on you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

My experience has been that transgendered people will correct you politely when accidentally misgendered. They get it. They don’t like it, but they get it.

It’s the cisgendered people who get offended when they are accidentally misgendered (i.e. calling a cis-female who has masculine features “he/him”).

No different than assuming a fat woman is pregnant or a man with a high voice is gay. And the embarrassment is felt all the same, for both parties.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

People genuinely do care considering Jordan Peterson’s entire career is based on the whole “you can’t force me to use your pronouns” bullshit that no one was trying to force him to do in the first place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Both of those things are lies. And I showed a link that demonstrated the lies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

So you’re saying that the loonys care.

Loony for. Loony against. Twins, basically.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

No, I’m saying bigots and assholes care. You can be sane and be a bigot and/or an asshole. And there a huge number of such people.

And if you mean that people who know what their gender is are loony and would prefer it if people didn’t get it wrong, you are probably loony yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

I will start by saying I am very open minded and really don’t agree with a lot of what Peterson says. I’m also pro LGBT and leaving people be who they are and love the life that makes them happy… But he’s right that we shouldn’t be forced to use someone’s pronouns. At the time there was discussion about making this a law. If someone wants to be a prick let them. Better to know who they are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

No one is being forced.

For fuck’s sake.

Peterson just lied about the bill.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/qbnamx/no-the-trans-rights-bill-doesnt-criminalize-free-speech

No one is stopping him or anyone else from being a bigoted asshole. Asking people to stop doing it and telling them why is not forcing them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It was made a law, it’s also a law in many parts of the US. It’s not about preventing random people from being pricks, it’s about discouraging harassment from employers, school administrations, and government officials. They’re prohibited from persistently misgendering you in the same way they’re prohibited from calling you slurs. I struggle to imagine a scenario where life would be improved by removing those sensible guard rails on civil society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Nobody is “forced to use pronouns” at present but this stance misses the point. It looks at the harms of misgendering as a situation that doesn’t cause other inequities and harms.

For the average social interaction where you are on equal terms but can walk away being misgendered is something a lot of us hate but live with like any small annoyance. It is like stubbing your toe. Not fun but whatever it’s fine that’s just “someone being a prick”. But if deliberate misgendering is allowed to happen over a long period in a workplace setting it is not something we get to walk away from. If we have to regularly interact with that person or lose our ability to feed and house ourselves then we are forced to have mental health problems because someone essentially doesn’t like being told what to do. Having to deal with panic attacks at work because you had to be locked in a room with someone hitting every trauma trigger you have exposed to the world or else you have to find a new and maybe worse job is a barrier to participation in society.

If it’s in a medical setting where we have to balance our health outcomes knowing that if we don’t comply with the misgendering our care is impacted because a doctor holds our lives or the relief from pain in their hands. A lot of trans people become shy and don’t seek help early and often because they equate doctors visits with a sense of powerlessness and shame knowing that they can’t stand up for themselves. In that instance it’s not just “someone being a dick” you are placing someone’s complete physical wellbeing before someone’s egotistical need to be “right” about you.

If a trans person in a social club and misgendering isn’t checked by a majority it can mean that they might not have a choice on whether or not to go. The world becomes a smaller place when you have gender related trauma.

Deliberate misgendering in a professional setting isn’t just “someone showing you they are a prick” the burden always falls upon trans people disproportionately because our participation in society often forces us to compromise directly on our health and there are real traumas and weaknesses that underlie our transness. If someone was openly making rape jokes around someone you knew had sexual assault trauma you’d step in right? Why not the same for someone with gender related traumas?

What Peterson is railing against is protections for participation in regular society through professional setting misgendering cases.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-33 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

What are you even talking about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Is this invading your safe space?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Gender-concerned people telling me how to speak is like fundamentalists telling me to wear a dress. I tell them both to piss up a rope.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

the fundies are just as full of performance moral grandstanding hypocracy as the pronoun nutbags.

I don’t understand. What is the middle ground between “you should refer to trans people by their chosen gender” and “you shouldn’t refer to trans people by their chosen gender”? Do you flip a coin?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Yes indeed.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Microblog Memes

!microblogmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, Twitter X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.6K

    Posts

  • 65K

    Comments