You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
56 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

Would it be possible to make a nuke small enough to kill just one person

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Polonium?

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

permalink
report
parent
reply

Doesn’t really explode tho

permalink
report
parent
reply

Comically tiny nuke.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

That’s as much a matter of isolating the person as shrinking the yield

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

World’s Smallest Nuclear Bomb from MDK

permalink
report
parent
reply

I’m willing to support the senator being used as a test subject to determine if it’s possible

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Well, a nuke is a sphere of c4 wrappy around a couple of pieces of plutonium, so if we’re not to hung up on the nuclear explosion part then yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Wait, if that’s the case why does it take massive teams of scientists to develop a nuke? I could duck tape some plutonium to a brick of C4 if I didn’t care about getting cancer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

:muppets-bunson: “In the saline solution inside this syringe floats the smallest nuclear bomb known to science! …At least I hope it is, as it is invisible to the naked eye.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Give Lindsey Graham a demon core

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Hit him with the Demon Flail

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Any existing nuclear weapon would work for that, just drop it on him without detonating it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Then it’d be functioning as a bullet, not a nuke

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Straight up his bum hole.

permalink
report
parent
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.6K

    Posts

  • 134K

    Comments