You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
65 points

BISEXUAL THREESOMES are NOT against the Bible! Only Gay People are!

permalink
report
reply
13 points

The original translation of “men are prohibited to lay down with man” is more akin to “men are prohibited from laying down with boys”

So the only real verse in the Bible that mentions homosexuality is actually telling people to not be pedos

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

angry Catholic priest noises

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No.

First off there are two passages in the O.T. that directly prescribe the death penalty for male homosexuality, not one like you said.

Second neither one of which contain the Hebrew word for “boy”. Both use the words to describe a man.

Third even if they somehow meant to write boy but didn’t in context it would still work out to mean man.

Fourth the rest of the bible is completely consistent on this which is almost shocking given that it is consistent on so little. From Leviticus all the way to Paul, we got about a thousand years of different writers all saying the same thing on this one issue.

Fifth even texts that didn’t make it it in the Bible (at least directly) like Enoth still go after it.

Sixth the oldest commentaries all agree what the rules were about this.

The abhramic faiths are on the text level homophobic. No amount of apologetics, or crappy translations, or recontextual work will change what they contain. When people or religions tell you what they are about believe them. And stop following these shit tier religions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What is your source for this? Sounds like something my religious grandma drops to justify all of the bad in that book.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I am betting the are misremembering a thing that was making the rounds claiming that Paul meant in one of his letters Romans chapter 1.

It isn’t correct because

A. He had a perfectly good Greek word for being a pedo and didn’t use it

B. The passage is clear that it was consensual act he was condemning

C. Who cares? We have two other letters (one granted is a forgery) where it is condemned

Why can’t people just accept that these people were homophobic? They were. If you are from an Abrahamic faith your skydaddy is a homophobic piece of shit and so we’re the people who claim to speak for him. Stop praying to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Technically the meaning behind the word sodomy was never recorded consistently through the ages so you can basically say it’s whatever you want and therefor the bible is against it. For example, maybe Felatio is Sodomy. Maybe non-metaphorically eating corndogs is Sodomy. Or both or neither.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The only thing we can say for sure is that daughters getting their father drunk and raping him to get pregnant probably didn’t happen in Sodom. It happened directly after by the only “good” people allowed to survive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s your reward for being good! You get to rape your dad and have his kid!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ok but that word isn’t in the Bible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It evolved from peccatum Sodomiticum which is latin for the Sin of Sodom.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

deleted by creator

If only this would happen to Christianity.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 511K

    Comments