You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
4 points

Is monoculture the word of the week on Lemmy? Let’s be clear, carbon dioxide doesn’t care what kind of tree converts it to oxygen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Monculture only convert about half the Co2 that a real forest would.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How much CO2 does a solar panel convert?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I doesn’t need to convert CO2 when it helps to produce less CO2 in the first place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I don’t know. But maybe it should be word of the week, month, year or decade given that the concept seems to not have been stressed enough in education and people constantly miss the issues created by monocultures, wether it’s soil damage, higher need for fertilizers, susceptibility to diseases or parasites (reqiring again more chemicals) or the simple fact that plants for monocultures are rarely chosen based on perfect climatic conditions (so even more at risk with changing climate). Ffs… regarding trees in particular the ones planted are often just picked for their straight trunks, so the wood is easier to sell later…

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.5K

    Posts

  • 27K

    Comments

Community moderators