You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

I question if cutting them off would actually hurt them that much. Like, it would hurt, but not in a project-ending way. It’s far better IMO to use the prospect as encouragement for them to not be openly disruptive in the future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Hurting Meta shouldn’t be the goal. Not providing direct access for Meta tentacles to the userbase should be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Hmm. Are you worried more about our data being used, or us being lured into a proprietary service?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

I won’t kid myself that our data will be used either way. What I’m concerned about the most might be the negative attention that Meta will bring to federation. I have little doubt government regulation and strangulation will follow.

If my understanding is correct, it also means that other instances will be footing part of the bill and doing the legwork to propagate and extend Meta’s spiderweb?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The only thing it could hurt is us, if everyone defederates people on threads won’t even have a chance to be exposed to other parts of the fediverse, making it even easier for Meta to execute EEE

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Exclusion breeds interest. Nobody cares about going to Mcdonald’s but there’s years long waiting lists for multi Michelin star restaurants.

permalink
report
parent
reply

sdfpubnix

!sdfpubnix@lemmy.sdf.org

Create post

Fans of SDF

Community stats

  • 190

    Monthly active users

  • 171

    Posts

  • 1.5K

    Comments

Community moderators