You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
26 points
*

I don’t think that there is any purpose to “bringing visibility” to global warming in 2024. Effectively everyone is already aware of global warming and has been for some time.

The issue isn’t awareness, but disagreement over the weight to put on policies to mitigate it. And I don’t expect that doing stuff like this is going to change people’s positions on that weight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s less about visibility that it’s happening, but that it’s not properly fought.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

If this isnt going to change anyones opinions, then why the outrage? We’re all fucked anyways, so let them be upset.

More people tone policing these activists than are upset about the very possible end of our species.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

The fact that you’re using the wrong term just shows that yeah, it kinda does need more visibility I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Grow up and stop trying to start fights over stupid bullshit please

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
*

It’s not global warming though, it’s climate change because it causes extremes at both ends. It’s extremely important to stop perpetuating the wrong term.

Maybe the one that needs to grow up is the ones not educating themselves on what the correct terms are and how it’s not just “warming”…? Yeah…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

What “wrong term”? Global warming? Because The Guardian prefers to call it “global heating”? Or am I missing something, because that complaint would be amazingly petty.

Anyway it’s not about bringing visibility to global warming to make people aware that it’s going on. It’s about making a statement. That statement, as I understand it, is “Climate change! Wake the fuck up and do something about it, people!” I don’t know if anything will sufficiently get that message through, but it’s understandable that they want to try, and painting Stonehenge orange (reportedly in a non-toxic water-soluble paint that will wash away in the rain) seems like a somewhat effective way to get the attention of the news media.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

Climate change, the article literally only uses that term… it’s quite a simple but very important distinction.

It’s climate change since it causes extremes at both ends.

Your ignorance isn’t an excuse.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.de

Create post

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 30K

    Comments

Community moderators